IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Sh Sachin Kumar @ Bala – Appellant
Versus
The State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Cr.M.C. 6640 of 2023
Decided On : 15-09-2023
Section 498A/406/34 IPC - The court referred to these sections of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with cruelty towards a married woman and criminal breach of trust. The court considered the charges mentioned in the FIR and the settlement agreement to reach its decision to quash the FIR and related proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition for quashing FIR No. 0491/2018 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Begum Pur, Rohini, Delhi. The parties had resolved their disputes amicably and entered into a compromise deed. A mutual divorce petition was also filed and a decree of divorce was granted. The petitioner requested the court to quash the FIR and all proceedings related to it.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the settlement agreement and the fact that the parties had reached an amicable resolution. It referred to previous judgments that emphasized the importance of putting an end to matrimonial differences through settlement. The court exercised its inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the court's process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court can quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial differences if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. The court's inherent powers under section 482 of the Code can be exercised to secure the ends of justice.
Result: FIR No. 0491/2018 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Begum Pur, Rohini, Delhi and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A.24869/2023 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 6640/2023
1. The present petition has been filed for quashing FIR No. 0491/2018 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Begum Pur, Rohini, Delhi.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent no.2/complainant married petitioner no.1 on 31.12.2017 in accordance with the Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. No child was born out the wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties started living separately since 18.04.2018 and instituted multiple litigations against each other and their respective families including the present FIR.
3. Learned Counsel further submits that during the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably and in furtherance thereof they have entered into a compromise deed dated 10.05.2022. As per the settlement it has been agreed between the parties that the petitioner shall pay Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Only) in full and final settlement of the entire dispute to respondent no. 2/complainant.
4. Pursuant to the settlement, a mutual divorce petition was also filed and a decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 15.12.2022 passed by Learned Judge, Family Courts, Rohini, Delhi. He submits that the chargesheet, in this case, has already been filed and the matter is pending before the Learned MM, Rohini Court, Delhi.
5. Furthermore, the Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the parties have resolved all their differences amicably, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to quash FIR No. 0491/2018 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Begum Pur, Rohini, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
6. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non- compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675;K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A.Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.
7. Both parties are present in court and have duly been identified by the IO. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has entered the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force or coercion. She submits that other petitions have already been withdrawn or dismissed. And since the marriage between the parties has also been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent order/judgment dated 15.12.2022, she has no objection if FIR No. 0491/2018 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Begum Pur, Rohini, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
8. I have gone through the settlement which has been placed on record. The settlement agreement provides for the following terms and conditions:
"1. That as per the Mutual understanding between the parties the Second Party/Husband has agreed to pay a total amount of Rs.3,00,000/(Rupees Three Lakhs only) to the First Party/wife as full and final settlement amount against all claims (permanent alimony as well as all past present and future claims).
2. That it is further settled between the parties that the second party/husband shall pay the first instalment in a sum ofRs.1,00,000/- at the time of signing of this compromise, agreement and remaining amount in two further instalments which is as Rs. 100,000/- at the time of recording the statement of First Motion, Divorce by Mutual Consent and remaining amount in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- at the time of r
The court can quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial differences if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The voluntary and amicable nature of a settlement in cases arising from matrimonial differences can be a basis for quashing non-compoundable offences under relevant legal provisions.
The court emphasized the use of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court, particularly in cases of amicable settlement....
The court can exercise its inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in matrimonial disputes, if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, especially in cases arising out of matrimonial dif....
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, using inherent powers under section 482 of the Cod....
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the parties, especially in cases of matrimoni....
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes based on amicable settlements and mutual divorce decrees.
Exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties in m....
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.