Back
NAJMI WAZIRI, VIKAS MAHAJAN
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of testator and will's execution (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. execution and codicil details (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. compliance with legal requirements and objections (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. grounds for dismissal of probate petition (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. state's arguments against the probate (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. execution and proving the will requirements (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 7. reliability of witness testimonies (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. clarification of suspended witness roles (Para 46 , 48 , 54) |
| 9. danial latifi's potential signing issue resolved (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 64) |
| 10. original vs duplicate will paradox (Para 70 , 71) |
| 11. objectors’ withdrawal significance and implications (Para 76 , 80) |
| 12. court's order on granting probate (Para 93 , 99 , 100) |
| 13. finalization of court's conclusions and order (Para 101 , 102) |
JUDGMENT
Najmi Waziri, J.
Facts:
1. These three appeals impugn the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge on 03.07.2012 dismissing the appellant's Testamentary Case No. 26/1987 seeking probate of the last Will and Testament dated 30.10.1985, executed by Late Raja Bahadur Sardar Singh of Khetri (`Testator'). While FAO(OS) 347/2012 has been
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
