IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Manoj Jain, JJ.
Corporal Kumavat Sagar Nana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 9213 of 2023 & CM APPL. 35091 of 2023, CM APPL. 35092 of 2023, CM APPL. 35093 of 2023
Decided On : 13-07-2023
Leave - Armed Forces Tribunal - The court transferred the petition to the Armed Forces Tribunal for consideration of the petitioner's application for leave or discharge to pursue a course, citing a previous judgment establishing the Tribunal's competence to hear challenges to policies and decisions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought leave or discharge from the Air Force to pursue a 24-month course in Hospital Administration & Healthcare Management at Indian Institute of Management, Jammu. No final decision on the application had been communicated to the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court transferred the petition to the Armed Forces Tribunal and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for leave or discharge.
Issues: Challenge to policies and decisions of the Air Force regarding leave and discharge for pursuing educational courses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on a previous judgment establishing the competence of the Armed Forces Tribunal to hear challenges to subordinate legislations, rules, regulations, notifications, and circulars.
Final Decision: The petition was transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal, and the respondents were directed to consider the petitioner's application for leave or discharge.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--Petitioner, inter alia, impugns policy dated 04.09.2017 titled `Permission to Appear in Entrance Exam' as also the Air Force order dated 4/23 titled `Discharge from Service on Compassionate and Other Grounds: Airmen & NCs(E)'. Petitioner, who was enlisted as Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) on 03.04.2013 seeks leave from the respondent for pursuing the course "Masters in Business Administration (Hospital Administration & Healthcare Management) at Indian Institute of Management, Jammu. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the course is for a period of 24 months commencing on 22.07.2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to avail of any admissible leave for the said purpose. Alternatively, he submits that he would be constrained to even take discharge from the Air Force for the purpose of joining said course. This he submits in view of the fact that undertaking the course would be highly beneficial for the petitioner and for his career progression.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had sought leave and/or discharge but no final decision on the application has yet been communicated to him.
4. Reference may be had to the decision of the Full Bench of this Court dated 26.05.2023 in WP(C) 9139/2019 titled Squadron Leader Neelam Chahar vs. Union of India & Ors., wherein, the Full Bench of this Court has held that the Armed Forces Tribunal is competent to hear the challenge to the vires of subordinate legislations, rules, regulations, notifications and circulars etc.
5. In view of the said judgment, the Armed Forces Tribunal is competent to entertain the challenge as raised by the petitioner in the present petition, inter alia, challenge to the policies and decision.
6. Viewed thus, we transfer this petition to the Armed Forces Tribunal (Principal Bench). In view of the urgency expressed by the petitioner, the parties shall appear before the Principal Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal on 19th July, 2023.
7. In the meantime, respondents are directed to consider the application dated 13.06.2023 (at page 64 of the petition) moved by the petitioner seeking leave and in the alternative, discharge.
8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
Competence of the Armed Forces Tribunal to hear challenges to policies and decisions of the Air Force.
The court emphasized that any modification to the policy regarding permission for pursuing higher education could only be made by the Air Force and not by the Court.
Armed Forces Tribunal would be subject to jurisdiction of High Court in Article 226 – Tribunal subject to High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226, cannot be permitted by law, to direct framing of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of the maintainability of the petition and the jurisdiction of the Armed Forces Tribunal to hear challenges to the vires of subor....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.