ANISH DAYAL
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The instant appeal has been filed under Order XLI read with Section 96 Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) assailing impugned judgment and decree dated 07th February, 2023 passed by Ld. ADJ, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in case bearing CS No.1013/2019 titled as Raj Kumar v. Pradeep Kumar & Anr..
The Suit
2. The respondent/plaintiff had filed a suit for mandatory and permanent injunction, claiming to be the owner and in possession of property bearing no. B-140, Partap Garden, Bindapur, New Delhi-110059, admeasuring 200 Sq.Yards, since 1987. The appellant/defendant no.1 was the son and appellant/defendant no.2, the wife of defendant no.1 was daughter-in-law of the respondent/plaintiff. As per the plaintiff, he had given oral permission to the defendants to live in a part of the suit property.
3. The defendant/appellants would, however, regularly quarrel with the respondent/plaintiff. By using threats and coercion; they retained permissive possession of the suit property. No money was ever paid by the defendants to the plaintiff at any point of time. Besides the threats, the plaintiff was assaulted by the defendants as well, and also on occasions when defendant no.1 was under the infl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.