SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3006

ANISH DAYAL
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.K. Shrivastava, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr. Kuldeep Rana, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The instant appeal has been filed under Order XLI read with Section 96 Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) assailing impugned judgment and decree dated 07th February, 2023 passed by Ld. ADJ, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in case bearing CS No.1013/2019 titled as Raj Kumar v. Pradeep Kumar & Anr..

The Suit

2. The respondent/plaintiff had filed a suit for mandatory and permanent injunction, claiming to be the owner and in possession of property bearing no. B-140, Partap Garden, Bindapur, New Delhi-110059, admeasuring 200 Sq.Yards, since 1987. The appellant/defendant no.1 was the son and appellant/defendant no.2, the wife of defendant no.1 was daughter-in-law of the respondent/plaintiff. As per the plaintiff, he had given oral permission to the defendants to live in a part of the suit property.

3. The defendant/appellants would, however, regularly quarrel with the respondent/plaintiff. By using threats and coercion; they retained permissive possession of the suit property. No money was ever paid by the defendants to the plaintiff at any point of time. Besides the threats, the plaintiff was assaulted by the defendants as well, and also on occasions when defendant no.1 was under the infl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top