Back
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Chand Bi Bi College of Education For Women – Appellant
Versus
National Counsel For Teacher Education – Respondent
ORDER
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner-institution has filed the instant writ petition against the order dated 07.01.2022 passed by the respondent-Southern Regional Committee (hereinafter referred to as `SRC') whereby, the recognition of the petitioner-institution for running B.Ed course has been withdrawn. The petitioner-institution also challenges order dated 21.12.2022 passed by respondent no.1-NCTE in appeal under Section 18 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as `NCTE Act').
2. The facts of the case show that the petitioner-institution is a Government aided educational institution. The petitioner-institution is running B.Ed course since 1986, even before NCTE Act came into force. After coming into force of the NCTE Act, the petitioner-institution was granted recognition with retrospective effect.
3. The petitioner-institution was granted recognition by the SRC vide order dated 14.10.1996 which has been placed on record as (Annexure P-2). Thereafter, vide recognition order dated 17.01.2002, the SRC also granted permanent recognition to the petitioner-institution for B.Ed course. After coming into force of the
The court emphasized the importance of proper consideration of deficiencies and explanations in the withdrawal of recognition under the NCTE Act, and the requirement for a fresh inspection and issuan....
Regulatory bodies play a crucial role in maintaining educational standards, but the court has the authority to set aside orders and allow re-inspection if the petitioner claims to have fulfilled all ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an institution should be given a reasonable opportunity to address deficiencies before withdrawal of recognition, and additional reasons for w....
The appellate authority must consider the documents submitted by the petitioner and make acceptable findings before making a decision on the withdrawal of recognition.
The court emphasized the importance of the NRC's statutory obligation and the need for immediate measures to enforce compliance with regulations, leading to the setting aside of the NRC's decision an....
The need for commensurate faculty strength as per the NCTE Act and the requirement for proper authorization for admitting students.
Compliance with NCTE Regulations is essential for recognition; failure leads to withdrawal of recognition, as demonstrated in this case.
The importance of proof of service of the Show Cause Notice and the violation of principles of natural justice influenced the court's decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
