Back
YOGESH KHANNA
G. S. Express Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ntpc Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Yogesh Khanna, J.
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The only contention raised in the present petition is the arbitration was not invoked within time and hence petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is not maintainable. The relevant clauses are as under:
"7. Settlement of Disputes
7.1 Mutual Consultation If any dispute of any kind whatsoever shall arise between the Employer and the Contractor in connection with or arising out of the Contract, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, or the execution of the Works, whether during the progress of the Works or after their completion and whether before or after the termination, abandonment or breach of the Contract, the parties shall seek to resolve any such dispute or difference by mutual consultation. If the parties fail to resolve such a dispute or difference by mutual consultation, then the dispute may be settled through Expert Settlement Council / Arbitration / other reme
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict construction of arbitration clauses and the adherence to the terms of the arbitration agreement by the parties.
Contractual provisions cannot extinguish rights to invoke arbitration beyond lawful limitations set by statute, upholding that timelines for claims start from when notice to arbitrate is issued.
The court ruled that claims regarding limitation and the validity of invoking arbitration must be determined by the Arbitral Tribunal, reaffirming the applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation A....
Arbitration requests must be filed within three years of the cause of action; failure to act in time bars subsequent petitions.
At the stage of appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the referral court’s scope of inquiry is limited to the prima facie existence of the arbit....
An application under Section 11 for appointment of an arbitrator is time-barred if filed after three years from the refusal to appoint, with delays not justified.
The period of limitation for filing a petition seeking appointment of an Arbitrator is distinct from the period of limitation for the substantive claims made in the underlying commercial contract.
The limitation period for invoking arbitration is determined by the failure to appoint an arbitrator, and the existence of an arbitration agreement is the primary consideration for the court under Se....
Claims for arbitration must be raised promptly upon accrual of rights; failure to do so results in dismissal due to limitation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
