IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Yogesh Khanna, J.
M/s G. S. Express Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ntpc Ltd. – Respondent
Arb.P. 374 of 2023
Decided On : 16-08-2023
Arbitration - Invocation of Arbitration - Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 11 - 7.3.1, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 - The court discussed the relevant clauses of the contract, including the conditions for invoking arbitration, the limitations on the disputed amount, and the time frame for invoking arbitration. The court referred to precedents to interpret the arbitration clauses and emphasized the strict construction of arbitration clauses. The court held that certain disputes may be unarbitral and that the terms of the arbitration agreement must be adhered to by the parties.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The respondent contended that the arbitration was not invoked within the specified time period, making the petition not maintainable.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the arbitration was invoked after the specified period, but relied on precedents to interpret the arbitration clauses and held that the petition was maintainable.
Issues: The main issue was whether the arbitration was invoked within the specified time period as per the arbitration agreement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the strict construction of arbitration clauses and held that the terms of the arbitration agreement must be adhered to by the parties.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
JUDGMENT
Yogesh Khanna, J.
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The only contention raised in the present petition is the arbitration was not invoked within time and hence petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is not maintainable. The relevant clauses are as under:
"7. Settlement of Disputes
7.1 Mutual Consultation If any dispute of any kind whatsoever shall arise between the Employer and the Contractor in connection with or arising out of the Contract, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, or the execution of the Works, whether during the progress of the Works or after their completion and whether before or after the termination, abandonment or breach of the Contract, the parties shall seek to resolve any such dispute or difference by mutual consultation. If the parties fail to resolve such a dispute or difference by mutual consultation, then the dispute may be settled through Expert Settlement Council / Arbitration / other remedies available under the applicable laws.
7.2 Resolution of Dispute through Expert Settlement Council If the parties fail to resolve such a dispute or difference by mutual consultation, the dispute if the parties agree, may be referred to Conciliation in cases involving disputed amount up to Rs 250 crores, which is to be arrived at considering the claim and counter claim of the parties to the dispute.
7.3 Arbitration
7.3.1 If the process of mutual consultation and/or ESC fails to arrive at a settlement between the parties as mentioned at GCC Sub-Clauses 7.1 &
7.2 above, Employer or the Contractor may, within Thirty (30) days of such failure, give notice to the other party, with a copy for information to the ESC (as applicable), of its intention to commence arbitration, as hereinafter provided, as to the matter in dispute, and no arbitration in respect of this matter may be commenced unless such notice is given. The mechanism of settling the disputes through arbitration shall be applicable only in cases where the disputed amount (i.e. total amount of Claims excluding claims of interest) does not exceed Rs. 25 crores. In case the disputed amount exceeds Rs. 25 Crores, the parties shall be within their rights to take recourse to remedies as may be available to them under the applicable laws other than Arbitration after prior intimation to the other party. There shall be no arbitration where the claim amount is only up to Rs. 5 lakhs.
The parties at the time of invocation of arbitration shall submit all the details of the claims and the counter-claims including the Heads/Sub- heads of the Claims/Counter-Claims and the documents relied upon by the parties for their respective claims and counter-claims. The parties shall not file any documents/details of the claims and counter-claims thereafter.
The claims and the counter claims raised by the parties at the time of invocation of the arbitration shall be final and binding on the parties and no further change shall be allowed in the same at any stage during arbitration under any circumstances whatsoever.
The parties to the contract shall invoke arbitration within Six months from the date of completion of the execution of work under the contract or the termination of the contract as the case may be and the parties shall not invoke arbitration later on after expiry of the said period of six months.
The parties shall not invoke arbitration other than in the case of completion of execution of work or the termination of the contract as mentioned above.
Notwithstanding the above, in case of disputes with Indian Contractor who is a Central Government Department /Enterprise /organisation or a State Level Public Enterprise (SLPE), the aforesaid limit of Rs 25 crores shall not be applicable and arbitration proceeding may be co
Grasim Industries Limited vs. State of Kerala
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict construction of arbitration clauses and the adherence to the terms of the arbitration agreement by the parties.
Contractual provisions cannot extinguish rights to invoke arbitration beyond lawful limitations set by statute, upholding that timelines for claims start from when notice to arbitrate is issued.
The court ruled that claims regarding limitation and the validity of invoking arbitration must be determined by the Arbitral Tribunal, reaffirming the applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation A....
Arbitration requests must be filed within three years of the cause of action; failure to act in time bars subsequent petitions.
At the stage of appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the referral court’s scope of inquiry is limited to the prima facie existence of the arbit....
An application under Section 11 for appointment of an arbitrator is time-barred if filed after three years from the refusal to appoint, with delays not justified.
The period of limitation for filing a petition seeking appointment of an Arbitrator is distinct from the period of limitation for the substantive claims made in the underlying commercial contract.
The limitation period for invoking arbitration is determined by the failure to appoint an arbitrator, and the existence of an arbitration agreement is the primary consideration for the court under Se....
Claims for arbitration must be raised promptly upon accrual of rights; failure to do so results in dismissal due to limitation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.