IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Mr Surender Mohan Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Abhinav Shrivastava (Bhopali) & Ors. – Respondents
CS(COMM) 412 of 2021 & I.A. 286 of 2023
Decided On : 23-08-2023
Settlement Agreement - Dispute Resolution - The court found the settlement agreement to be lawful and in order, and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement, with the parties remaining bound by its terms.
Fact of the Case:
The disputes between the parties were settled with the intervention of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. A settlement agreement was reached, and the court found it to be lawful and in order.
Finding of the Court:
The court decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement, with the parties remaining bound by its terms. The plaintiff would be entitled to a refund of the court fees, if any, deposited by it.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The settlement agreement was found to be lawful and in order, and the court decreed the suit in terms of the agreement, with the parties remaining bound by its terms.
Final Decision: The suit was decreed in terms of the settlement agreement, with the parties remaining bound by its terms.
ORDER (Oral)
1. The disputes between the parties stand settled with the intervention of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
2. Settlement agreement dated 16 August 2023 is on record.
3. The terms of settlement read thus:
"a) That the Second Party has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Only) to the First Party on account of Settlement of entire claim of the First Party in the suit, against all the Defendants.
b) That the First Party has agreed for full and final settlement of the suit amount for Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Only).
c) That Sh. Abhinav Srivastava @ Bhopali of the Second Party has issued a cheque bearing No. 466155 dated 17.09.2023 drawn on Karnataka Bank Ltd., Oshiwara, Jogeshwari (W) branch, Mumbai in favour of the First Party for a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Only) on account of payments as mentioned in para 1 and 2 hereinabove. Copy of the said cheque is annexed as ANNEXURE C.
d) That the Second Party undertakes that the above said cheque shall be honored on its presentation and in case of dishonor of the said cheque, the First Party shall be entitled to get the same executed through Court of law as a money decree, apart from the consequences entailed i.e. Contempt of Court.
e) That apart from payment of the aforesaid settlement amount, the Second Party through Sh. Abhinav Srivastava @ Bhopali has also regretted and apologized for the inconvenience caused to the First Party on account of their acts and the premises of settlement on token amount is based on the apology tendered by the Second Party to the First Party.
f) It is agreed between the parties that the present suit being CS (COMM.) 412/2021 may be decreed in terms of the present Settlement Agreement.
g) The Hon'ble Court may pass appropriate orders in view of this Settlement Agreement including refund of court fee under section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
h) The parties herein have voluntarily executed the present agreement of their own free will and accord, and without any pressure, undue influence, duress or force of any nature from any quarter whatsoever.
i) By signing and executing this Settlement Agreement, the parties hereto state that they have no further claims or demands against each other qua the present suit and all the disputes and differences have been amicably settled by the Parties hereto through the process of Mediation.
j) That the parties undertake before the Hon'ble Court to abide by the terms and conditions set out in this Settlement Agreement and not to dispute the same hereinafter in future."
4. Parties are represented by learned Counsel who undertake on behalf of their clients to remain bound by the terms of settlement.
5. The Court has perused the terms of settlement and find them to be lawful and in order.
6. As such, nothing further survives for consideration in this suit.
7. The suit shall stand decreed in terms of the aforesaid settlement agreement dated 16 August 2023 by which the parties shall remain bound.
8. Let a decree sheet be drawn up by the Registry.
9. The plaintiff would be entitled to refund of the court fees, if any, deposited by it.
The court upheld the validity of the settlement agreement and decreed the suit in terms of the agreement, with the parties remaining bound by its terms.
Parties are bound by their mutual consent to the terms of a settlement agreement, including any corrective adjustments, emphasizing the importance of precise terms and effective mediation.
Settlement agreements reached through mediation are binding and enforceable, and courts will endorse such resolutions to finalize disputes.
Enforceability and orderliness of the settlement agreement leading to the disposal of the suit and binding the parties to its terms
Mediation can effectively resolve disputes, allowing courts to decree settlements and refund court fees under relevant provisions when matters are amicably settled.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of parties to seek a decree in terms of a Settlement Agreement reached through mediation and the refund of entire court fees as per....
A settlement agreement reached by parties in trademark disputes is valid and can lead to a decree in its terms, including the refund of court fees based on amicable resolution.
Settlement agreements reached through mediation are binding and enforceable, and parties are entitled to court fee refunds when disputes are amicably resolved.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.