SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Hansraj Bansal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner as complainant filed criminal complaints under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against the respondents no. 2 being accused, bearing no 269/13 (subject matter of Crl. Rev. Petition bearing no 228/2017) titled as Hansraj Bansal Vs. Abdul Ahad on basis of cheque bearing no.188868 dated 05.04.2009 amounting to Rs.11,71,600/- drawn on ICICI Bankwhich returned unpaid due to Payment Stopped by Drawer; 346/13 (subject matter of Crl. Rev. Petition bearing no 229/2017) titled as Hansraj Bansal Vs. Abdul Ahad on basis of cheque bearing no 176236 dated 15.03.2009 amounting to Rs.11,10,000/- drawn on ICICI Bank which returned unpaid due to Payment Stopped by Drawer; 265/13 (subject matter of Crl. Rev. Petition bearing no 230/2017) titled as Hansraj Bansal Vs. Farooq @ Bablu on basis of cheque bearing no.911692 dated 24.06.2012 amounting to Rs.5,00,000/- drawn on Punjab National Bank which returned unpaid due to Signature of the Drawer was not according to Mandate; 298/13 (subject matter of Crl. Rev. Petition bearing no 233/2017) titled as Hansraj Bansal Vs. Sarfaraz Ahmed on basis of cheque bearing no 078864
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.