Back
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Karan Chandela – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]
1. The present application on behalf of the applicant has been filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in FIR No. 476/2019 dated 20.09.2019 registered u/s 306 IPC at P.S. Tilak Nagar, New Delhi.
2. The case of the prosecution is as under:
a. On 19/09/2019 at 07:55 PM, a PCR Call was received at P.S. Tilak Nagar regarding "a 19 years girl having hanged herself, and she was declared `brought dead' at Vashisth Hospital, Ganga Ram Vatika", which was entrusted to S.I. Vinod for investigation.
b. Thereafter, S.I. Vinod along with the staff, reached at the said hospital and received MLC No 217/19 dated 19.09.2019 of Deceased (M) Age-19 with A/H/O brought dead & history of strangulation/hanging. The dead body of deceased (M) was got preserved in DDU Hospital Mortuary for further necessary proceedings.
c. The spot i.e., 2 Floor, WZ-26A, Mukherjee Park, Tilak Nagar, Delhi was visited by S.I. Vinod Kumar where a multi-colored Chunni was tied with ceiling fan and a black iron chair was laid on bed. Thereafter, the crime team was informed and after inspecting, the ab
For a charge under Section 306 IPC, clear evidence of instigation or encouragement to commit suicide is required, which was absent in this case.
The conduct of the accused, including making calls to witnesses and their subsequent turning hostile, raised strong presumption against the accused, influencing the court's decision to dismiss the ba....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail was influenced by the lack of specific allegations, absence of corroborative evidence, and inconclusive electronic evidence ....
Point of Law : Petitioner allegedly transmitted the obscene photographs of the prosecutrix to the prosecutrix’s brother bringing him prima facie withing the domain of Section 67 of the IT Act, 2020, ....
powers of the Court while considering bail application as “we are of the opinion that while it is true that Article 21 is of great importance because it enshrines the fundamental right to individual ....
(1) Expression “life” in Article 21 does not connote merely physical or animal existence – Right to life includes right to live with human dignity.(2) Capturing images and videos with consent of woma....
Service Matter - Minor Punishment - Appeal - As per Rules of 1991 a delinquent employee who is awarded minor punishments of censure entries under Rule 4 (b) can file an appeal under Rule 20 of Rules ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
