Sunil Gupta VS State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RAJEEV MISRA
Sunil Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Jawahir Yadav.
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Kailash Nath, R.P.S. Chauhan.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Jawahir Yadav, the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. R.P.S. Chauhan, along with Anand Yadav, learned Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Kailash Nath, the learned counsel representing first informant.

2. Perused the record.

3. This application for bail has been filed by the applicant, Sunil Gupta seeking his enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.227 of 2021, under Sections 498A, 304B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Sarpataha, District- Jaunpur, during the pendency of trial.

4. It transpires from record that marriage of the applicant namely, Sunil Gupta was solemnized with Sandhya on 27.04.2016 in accordance with Hindu Rites and Customs. From the aforesaid wedlock, initially a son namely, Om was born who is now aged about 04 years. Subsequently, a daughter namely, Nandani was born who is now said to be aged about one year and six months.

5. After expiry of a period of much more than five years and six months from the date of marriage of applicant, an unfortunate incident occurred on 24.12.2021, in which the wife of applicant namely, Sandhya died as she committed suicide by hanging herself. The information regarding