SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3705

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Jaya Venugopal Through Gpa Holder Pv Venugopal & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 5008 of 2022
Decided On : 15-09-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Viraj Datar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjav Jain, Mr. Saurav Jain, Advocates with all petitioners in person.
Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP and SI Vijay Pal Singh, PS CWC Nanakpura.
Mr. Nikhil Kapoor and Ms. Shagufa Khan, Advocates for R-2.

The voluntary nature of an amicable settlement, absence of coercion, and the interest of justice are crucial in deciding to quash proceedings arising from a settled matrimonial dispute.

Headnote:

Quashing of Complaint Cases - Matrimonial Dispute - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13B - Settlement agreement between parties - Quashing of FIR - Amicable settlement

Fact of the Case:

The petition seeks quashing of Complaint Cases arising from a matrimonial dispute, settled by a settlement deed. The settlement involved payment terms, dissolution of marriage, and withdrawal of other litigations between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the parties entered into an amicable settlement voluntarily, without coercion, and should be allowed to lead their lives peacefully. It held all parties bound by the undertaking given in the affidavits and quashed the pending Complaint Cases and related proceedings.

Issues: The main issue was the quashing of Complaint Cases arising from a settled matrimonial dispute and the validity of the settlement agreement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the voluntary nature of the settlement, absence of coercion, and the interest of justice in allowing the parties to lead peaceful lives as the key factors influencing its decision.

Final Decision: The Complaint Cases and related proceedings were quashed, and the petition along with pending applications was disposed of. The next hearing date was cancelled.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 24963/2023 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6670/2023 & CRL.M.A. 24788/2023

1. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of Complaint Cases bearing No. Complaint Case No. 0005136/2017 and Complaint Case No. 15784/2017 which are pending before the LD. ACMM-02, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

2. It has been submitted that the said complaints arose out of a matrimonial dispute which was settled by a settlement deed dated 24.11.2018 before the Counselling Cell, Saket Court, Delhi.

3. It has further been submitted that in terms of the settlement respondent No.2 had to pay Rs. 80 Lakhs out of which Rs. 40 Lakhs have been paid. However, now the petitioner No.1 who is appearing through VC states that she forgoes the remaining amount of Rs. 40 Lakhs and will not stake any claim over it. The attorney of petitioner No. 1 i.e., her father is also present in court and affirms the same.

4. The affidavits of the attorney of petitioner no. 1 and the petitioner no. 2 and 3 are on record. The affidavit of respondent No.2 is also on record.

5. Petitioner No. 1 submits that she has entered the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force, or coercion. She submits that other petitions have been withdrawn/dismissed and/or are to be withdrawn/dismissed on the next date of hearing as agreed between the parties. Since the marriage between the parties has also been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent order/judgment dated 07.05.2019, Respondent No. 2 who is present in court today states that he has no objection if Complaint Cases bearing No. Complaint Case No. 0005136/2017 and Complaint Case No. 15784/2017 which are pending before the LD. ACMM-02, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi are quashed.

6. The details of other litigations between the parties which are to be withdrawn are as follows:

    A. TO BE WITHDRAWN BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2,

    1.Complaint Case No. 27/2023:

    Harihara Ravi Iyer Vs PV Venugopal & Others

    Ms. T. Priyadarshini, Ld. A.C.M.M., South-District, Saket Courts, New Delhi

    NDOH: 17.10.2023

    2. RCA No. 22/2020

    Harihara Ravi Iyer Vs Jaya Venugopal & Other

    Ld. Additional District Judge-04, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi

    NDOH 22.08.2023,

    3. CS No. 22/2022

    Harihara Ravi Iyer Vs Jaya Venugopal & Others

    Ms. Shunali Gupta, Ld. Family Judge - 02, Family Court, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi

    NDOH 06.10.2023

    B. TO BE WITHDRAWN BY THE PETITIONERS,:

    1. Criminal Complainant DD No.: 54B Dated 16.09.2019

    P.S. Malviya Nagar:

    Filed by Petitioner no.03 against Respondent no.02 and subsequent Police complaint to DCP vide DY No. 2474 dated 08.07.2022.

    2.W. P. (Crl) No. 3149/2019

    Jaya Venugopal Through GPA Holder PV Venugopal Versus State and Another

    High Court of Delhi, New Delhi

    NDOH 30.10.2023

    3.Cont. Cas. (C) No. 820/2022

    Jaya Venugopal Through GPA Holder PV Venugopal Versus Harihara Ravi lyer

    High Court of Delhi, New Delhi

    NDOH 10.10.2023

7. Furthermore, the Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the parties have resolved all their differences amicably, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to quash Complaint Cases bearing No. Complaint Case No. 0005136/2017 and Complaint Case No. 15784/2017 which are pending before the LD. ACMM-02, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

8. I have gone through the settlement deed dated 24.11.2018 which has been placed on record. The settlement agreement provides for the following terms and conditions:

    "1. The parties have agreed to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent in accordance with the law as provided under section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

    2. It is agreed between the parties that husband shall pay to the wife u sum of Rs.80 Lacs (Rupees Eighty Lacs Only) as full & final settlement amount (against istridhan, dowry and maintenance towards past, present and future and rights in all immoveable

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top