IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Jaya Venugopal Through Gpa Holder Pv Venugopal & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 5008 of 2022
Decided On : 15-09-2023
Quashing of Complaint Cases - Matrimonial Dispute - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13B - Settlement agreement between parties - Quashing of FIR - Amicable settlement
Fact of the Case:
The petition seeks quashing of Complaint Cases arising from a matrimonial dispute, settled by a settlement deed. The settlement involved payment terms, dissolution of marriage, and withdrawal of other litigations between the parties.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties entered into an amicable settlement voluntarily, without coercion, and should be allowed to lead their lives peacefully. It held all parties bound by the undertaking given in the affidavits and quashed the pending Complaint Cases and related proceedings.
Issues: The main issue was the quashing of Complaint Cases arising from a settled matrimonial dispute and the validity of the settlement agreement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the voluntary nature of the settlement, absence of coercion, and the interest of justice in allowing the parties to lead peaceful lives as the key factors influencing its decision.
Final Decision: The Complaint Cases and related proceedings were quashed, and the petition along with pending applications was disposed of. The next hearing date was cancelled.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 24963/2023 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 6670/2023 & CRL.M.A. 24788/2023
1. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of Complaint Cases bearing No. Complaint Case No. 0005136/2017 and Complaint Case No. 15784/2017 which are pending before the LD. ACMM-02, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.
2. It has been submitted that the said complaints arose out of a matrimonial dispute which was settled by a settlement deed dated 24.11.2018 before the Counselling Cell, Saket Court, Delhi.
3. It has further been submitted that in terms of the settlement respondent No.2 had to pay Rs. 80 Lakhs out of which Rs. 40 Lakhs have been paid. However, now the petitioner No.1 who is appearing through VC states that she forgoes the remaining amount of Rs. 40 Lakhs and will not stake any claim over it. The attorney of petitioner No. 1 i.e., her father is also present in court and affirms the same.
4. The affidavits of the attorney of petitioner no. 1 and the petitioner no. 2 and 3 are on record. The affidavit of respondent No.2 is also on record.
5. Petitioner No. 1 submits that she has entered the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force, or coercion. She submits that other petitions have been withdrawn/dismissed and/or are to be withdrawn/dismissed on the next date of hearing as agreed between the parties. Since the marriage between the parties has also been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent order/judgment dated 07.05.2019, Respondent No. 2 who is present in court today states that he has no objection if Complaint Cases bearing No. Complaint Case No. 0005136/2017 and Complaint Case No. 15784/2017 which are pending before the LD. ACMM-02, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi are quashed.
6. The details of other litigations between the parties which are to be withdrawn are as follows:
A. TO BE WITHDRAWN BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2,
1.Complaint Case No. 27/2023:
Harihara Ravi Iyer Vs PV Venugopal & Others
Ms. T. Priyadarshini, Ld. A.C.M.M., South-District, Saket Courts, New Delhi
NDOH: 17.10.2023
2. RCA No. 22/2020
Harihara Ravi Iyer Vs Jaya Venugopal & Other
Ld. Additional District Judge-04, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi
NDOH 22.08.2023,
3. CS No. 22/2022
Harihara Ravi Iyer Vs Jaya Venugopal & Others
Ms. Shunali Gupta, Ld. Family Judge - 02, Family Court, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi
NDOH 06.10.2023
B. TO BE WITHDRAWN BY THE PETITIONERS,:
1. Criminal Complainant DD No.: 54B Dated 16.09.2019
P.S. Malviya Nagar:
Filed by Petitioner no.03 against Respondent no.02 and subsequent Police complaint to DCP vide DY No. 2474 dated 08.07.2022.
2.W. P. (Crl) No. 3149/2019
Jaya Venugopal Through GPA Holder PV Venugopal Versus State and Another
High Court of Delhi, New Delhi
NDOH 30.10.2023
3.Cont. Cas. (C) No. 820/2022
Jaya Venugopal Through GPA Holder PV Venugopal Versus Harihara Ravi lyer
High Court of Delhi, New Delhi
NDOH 10.10.2023
7. Furthermore, the Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the parties have resolved all their differences amicably, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to quash Complaint Cases bearing No. Complaint Case No. 0005136/2017 and Complaint Case No. 15784/2017 which are pending before the LD. ACMM-02, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.
8. I have gone through the settlement deed dated 24.11.2018 which has been placed on record. The settlement agreement provides for the following terms and conditions:
"1. The parties have agreed to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent in accordance with the law as provided under section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
2. It is agreed between the parties that husband shall pay to the wife u sum of Rs.80 Lacs (Rupees Eighty Lacs Only) as full & final settlement amount (against istridhan, dowry and maintenance towards past, present and future and rights in all immoveable
The voluntary nature of an amicable settlement, absence of coercion, and the interest of justice are crucial in deciding to quash proceedings arising from a settled matrimonial dispute.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus through genuine settlements, and continuing with the FIR may serve no useful purpose if the parties have amicably resolved their disputes.
Voluntary settlement in matrimonial disputes and the grant of divorce by mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
The duty of courts to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the need for proper drafting of settlement deeds.
The court can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in cases of amicable settlement in matrimonial differences.
In matrimonial matters, genuine settlement and mutual divorce can be valid grounds for quashing FIR and proceedings.
Courts should encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and respect settlements entered into voluntarily without coercion.
The court emphasized the significance of voluntary settlements in matrimonial disputes and applied the provisions of section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act to reach its decision.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash non-compoundable offences based on amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes, as provided under section 482 of....
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes based on amicable settlements and mutual divorce decrees.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.