IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Bansal, J.
Somdutt Singh @ Shivam - Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau - Respondent
Bail Appln. 2754 of 2022
Decided On : 01-12-2023
NDPS Act - Bail Application - Sections 8/22(c)/23/29 - The court discussed the provisions of the NDPS Act, including Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 52-A, and Section 37. The court also referred to various judgments such as Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu, Union of India v. Mohanlal, Bharat Chaudhary v. Union of India, and more, to interpret and apply the legal provisions in the present case.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was seeking bail in a case involving the possession and trafficking of commercial quantities of psychotropic substances. The prosecution presented evidence of recoveries made at the applicant's apartment and the Foreign Post Office, ITO, based on disclosures made by the applicant.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the recoveries of commercial quantities of psychotropic substances were made based on the applicant's disclosures, and WhatsApp chats between the applicant and co-accused persons were also presented as evidence. The court also addressed the non-compliance of procedural requirements under the NDPS Act and the admissibility of evidence.
Issues: The issues included the admissibility of recoveries made based on the applicant's disclosures, compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act, and the relevance of WhatsApp chats as evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that recoveries made based on the applicant's disclosures were admissible under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. It also emphasized that non-compliance with procedural requirements would be subject to trial and that the applicant failed to show prejudice caused by delayed compliance. The court distinguished the case from precedents where no recoveries were made from the accused.
Final Decision: The bail application was dismissed, as the court found that the applicant's involvement in the possession and trafficking of commercial quantities of psychotropic substances was evident based on the recoveries and evidence presented.
JUDGMENT
1. The present application has been filed seeking grant of regular bail in Crime No. VIII/25/DZU/2019 under Sections 8/22(c)/23/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The applicant has been in judicial custody since 8th April, 2021.
2. The brief facts of the case, as set up by the prosecution are as follows:
2.1 On 6th July, 2019, on receipt of information, the Narcotics Control Bureau (hereinafter "NCB") Team reached DTDC Express Limited Courier Company, New Delhi, where one parcel was found in the name of one Mr. Sudhir Shrivastava, Lucknow to one Mr. Amar Shrivastava, Lynchemburg, USA, which was opened and was found containing, inter alia, 500 strips of 10 tablets each of Alprazolam. Therefore, a total of 5000 tablets of Alprazolam were found.
2.2 Out of the recovered tablets, one strip of 10 tablets was opened and upon weighing the tablets, the weight of 10 tablets was found to be 2 grams. Therefore, total weight of the 5000 tablets of Alprazolam was ascertained to be 1 kg, which constitutes commercial quantity (commercial quantity of Alprazolam being 100 grams).
2.3 Upon investigation from the manufacturer of the medicines, it was found that the medicines were sold to M/s SS Medicos in District Ballia, Uttar Pradesh. It was revealed that one Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh was in charge of the affairs of M/s SS Medicos. Accordingly, Bhanu Pratap Singh was served with notice under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, who tendered his voluntary statement and disclosed that he had sold 20,000 tablets of Alprazolam to one Manish Gupta. Consequently, Bhanu Pratap Singh was arrested on 5th December, 2020.
2.4 Subsequently, upon notices under Section 67 of the NDPS Act being issued to the aforesaid Manish Gupta, he tendered his voluntary statement wherein he stated that out of the 20,000 tablets that he had purchased from Bhanu Pratap Singh, he had booked 5,000 tablets which were seized from DTDC, New Delhi and the remaining 15,000 tablets were sold to one Somdutt Singh. Manish Gupta also endorsed print outs of his conversations with Somdutt Singh and disclosed his involvement in the illegal trade in psychotropic substances. Consequently, Manish Gupta was arrested on 5th April, 2021.
2.5 Upon further investigation, Somdutt Singh was served with a notice under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, in pursuance of which he tendered his voluntary statement on 7th April, 2021, wherein he disclosed that a huge quantity of psychotropic substances was lying at his rented apartment situated at F4-19, 4th Floor, Pocket-2, Sector-2, Narela, Delhi (hereinafter 'Narela Flat'). On 7th April, 2021, the NCB team, accompanied by the applicant Somdutt Singh reached the aforesaid apartment and upon search of the same recovered 12,250 Tramadol tablets, 1500 Zolpidem Tablets, 400 Diazepam Tablets, 1.286 kg loose Alprazolam tablets and 2000 Clonazepam tablets, which constitute commercial quantity.
2.6 On 8th April, 2021, Somdutt Singh disclosed that he used to send parcels containing psychotropic substances abroad through different post offices by using fake IDs provided by one Arun @ Varun and Manish Gupta. He also disclosed that 16-17 parcels to USA were already booked with Rohini Sector-7 Post Office and messages regarding the details of the same were forwarded to Arun @ Varun. Consequently, 17 parcels were seized by the NCB at Foreign Post Office, ITO containing huge quantities of various psychotropic substances. Subsequent to these recoveries, Somdutt Singh was arrested on 8th April, 2021.
2.7 Further, at the instance of Somdutt Singh, tracking IDs and photographs of various parcels booked were recovered from his mobile phone. Consequently, on 21st September, 2021, 9 parcels were seized from the Foreign Post Office, ITO and commercial quantities of psychotropic substances were recovered.
3. The applicant Somdutt Singh had moved an application before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, NDPS, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi which was d
Non-compliance with procedural rules does not automatically render actions null and void, and the prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
The court reaffirmed that non-compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, particularly Section 52A, does not automatically entitle an accused to bail; the court must still find reasonab....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that possession of commercial quantity contraband invokes the rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, precluding bail. The judgment also emphasizes t....
Interim Bail on medical grounds - Indulge in supply of wholesale and retail cocaine - Petitioner's medical condition is concerned; documents on record do no suggest any immediate medical treatment or....
The court ruled that mere procedural lapses do not justify bail in cases involving commercial quantities of narcotics, emphasizing the presumption of conscious possession under the NDPS Act.
The court emphasized that bail under the NDPS Act requires satisfaction of two conditions: reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and that he is not likely to commit an offence wh....
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural safeguards in drug-related cases, granting bail due to significant delays and procedural lapses.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.