IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Navin Chawla, J.
Hikmatullah Hikmati - Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau - Respondent
Bail Application No. 1130 of 2022
Decided On : 20-02-2024
NDPS Act - Bail Application - Sections 8A/21(C)/23(C)/29 - The court discussed the violation of the Standing Orders in the sampling procedure, the delay in conducting the sampling, and the admissibility of the disclosure statement. The court emphasized the mandatory compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act and held that the delay in the sampling procedure raised doubts about the recovery of contraband, entitling the accused to be released on bail.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution alleged that the accused, an Afghan national, was apprehended at the airport with narcotics capsules in his stomach. Subsequent investigations led to the arrest of other individuals and the recovery of narcotics from different locations.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the delay in the sampling procedure and the admissibility of the disclosure statement raised doubts about the recovery of contraband, leading to the decision to release the accused on bail.
Issues: The issues revolved around the compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act in the sampling procedure, the admissibility of the disclosure statement, and the doubts raised about the recovery of contraband.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the mandatory compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act in the sampling procedure and held that the delay in conducting the sampling raised doubts about the recovery of contraband, entitling the accused to be released on bail.
Final Decision: The court directed the release of the accused on bail, considering the doubts raised about the recovery of contraband and the lengthy period of custody without recovery from the accused.
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. - This application has been filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, CrPC) read with Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, NDPS Act) seeking bail in SC No. 57/2020, titled as NCB v. Noorzai Gulamin & Ors., pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, under Sections 8A / 21(C) / 23(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that on 17.08.2019, at about 11:30 hours, on a secret information received, a person, namely, Mr.Noorzai Gul Amin, an Afghan National, was apprehended from the Arrival Terminal-3, Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport, New Delhi. On inquiry from him, he accepted that he has swallowed certain capsules containing Narcotic Drugs. He was, then, taken to the Safdarjung Hospital, where he was admitted on 17.08.2019. On 20.08.2019, the doctors informed that there is no foreign body left in the stomach of the applicant, therefore, he was discharged from the Safdarjung Hospital. At the hospital, he expelled a total of 119 capsules through the passage of stool. One of such capsule wrapped in transparent packet was taken and cut opened. It was found to be containing a white colour powdery substance. A small amount of the powdery substance was taken and tested with the help of the field testing kit, which gave a positive result for Heroin. A similar exercise was conducted for the remaining 118 capsules with the help of field testing kit, which all gave positive results for Heroin. The powdery substance recovered from total 119 capsules was, thereafter, collected in transparent polythene and was weighed to be 770 grams. The whole recovered white coloured powdery substance was, thereafter, mixed homogeneously and two representative samples of 05 grams each were drawn and put inside two transparent zip lock pouches and further kept into separate white colour paper envelops, giving them Mark A-1 and A-2 respectively.
3. It is further alleged that on 20.08.2019, accused Noorzai Gul Amin disclosed that he belongs to a village Gurz of Farah Province in Afghanistan. He had met one person in Kandhar who took him to an other person, namely, Nimahtullah Mangal, who in turn offered him a sum of Rs.50,000/- to carry narcotic drugs capsules to India in his stomach. He further disclosed that Nimahtullah Mangal had asked him to hand over the capsules after reaching India to one person called Doctor. He stated that Nimahtullah Mangal also gave the mobile number of the said Doctor. He also stated that Nimahtullah Mangal would be arriving in India on 21.08.2019.
4. The prosecution alleges that based on the disclosure statement of Noorzai Gul Amin, Nimahtullah Mangal was arrested when he landed in India on 21.08.2019. It is further alleged that Nimatullah Mangal, in his voluntary statement, admitted that about 7 to 8 months back, he had met a person named Abdul Khaliq, who offered him handsome money for arranging Visa for India for persons who would carry Heroin capsules to India by swallowing them. He stated that Abdul Khaliq told him to arrange contact in India for sale of the drugs. He stated that he then spoke to Dr. Allah Noor Noorzai and told him that Noorzai Gul Amin would be coming to India with drugs. The drugs carried by Noorzai Gul Amin were to be supplied to Dr. Allah Noor Noorzai and John @ Hikmatullah Hikmati, the applicant herein. It is stated that Nimahtullah Mangal provided the mobile number of Dr. Allah Noor Noorzai to the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) and also said that he can show the house where he shall be available.
5. The prosecution further alleges that a team of NCB Officers went to the house of the applicant herein, at Lajpat Nagar. Nimahtullah Mangal knocked at the door and also called for the applicant. The applicant opened the door on which Nimahtullah Mangal identified him as the receiver of the drugs. Dr. Allah Noor Noor
The court reaffirmed that non-compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, particularly Section 52A, does not automatically entitle an accused to bail; the court must still find reasonab....
Section 52-A of the Act, as Disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the defective sampling procedure at the time of recovery and seizure of contraband can be challenged during the trial before the Special Judge....
Non-compliance with procedural rules does not automatically render actions null and void, and the prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
The judgment established the importance of a reasonable time frame for filing an application for sample collection and certification under section 52A NDPS to prevent tampering with seized contraband....
Interim Bail on medical grounds - Indulge in supply of wholesale and retail cocaine - Petitioner's medical condition is concerned; documents on record do no suggest any immediate medical treatment or....
Narcotic Substances - Bail rejected - Petitioner has been found in possession of contraband of commercial quantity - Court is unable to record a finding that there are reasonable grounds for believin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.