IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tara Vitasta Ganju, J.
Acg Aircraft Leasing Ireland Limited & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 7774 of 2023 and CM Appl. 45749 of 2023 and CM Appl. 36909 of 2023
Decided On : 12-10-2023
Aircraft Inspection - Urgent Directions - Aircraft Rules, 1937, Aircraft Act, 1934 - The court discussed the provisions of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 and the Aircraft Act, 1934, particularly focusing on the inspection and maintenance of the aircraft. The interpretation of the lease agreements and the definition of 'Aircraft' and 'Aircraft Documents' were crucial in determining the rights of the lessors and the obligations of the respondent. The court emphasized the need for proper inspection and maintenance of the aircraft and issued urgent directions to preserve the value and integrity of the aircraft during the pendency of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The lessors sought modification of the interim order for urgent directions to access and inspect aircraft documents, records, and maintenance tasks. The lessors contended that the aircraft were not being maintained properly, and parts were being removed without permission, causing irreparable harm.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the lessors' urgent directions were necessitated by the deteriorating condition of the aircraft and the removal of parts, causing irreparable harm. The court also noted the lessors' prima facie case and the need for additional directions to protect the valuable equipment during the pendency of the case.
Issues: The issues revolved around the proper inspection and maintenance of the aircraft, the definition of 'Aircraft' and 'Aircraft Documents' in the lease agreements, and the urgent need to prevent irreparable harm to the lessors.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the lease agreements, the provisions of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, and the Aircraft Act, 1934, emphasizing the need for proper inspection and maintenance of the aircraft to preserve their value and integrity.
Final Decision: The court issued urgent directions for the provision of aircraft documents, records, and maintenance tasks, and permitted the lessors to contract a 24-hour security service for all the aircraft. The court emphasized the importance of preserving the value and integrity of the aircraft and closed the application for modification.
JUDGMENT
CM APPL. 45749/2023 in W.P.(C) 7774/2023[Application for modification of05.07.2023 Order]
CM APPL 47071/2023 in W.P.(C) 7663/2023 & CM APPL. 47257/2023 in W.P.(C) 9432/2023 [Application seeking urgent directions]
1. The present Applications have been filed by the Petitioners/Lessorsinter-alia seeking:
(a) Modification of the interim 05.07.2023 Order [hereinafter referred to as the 05.07.2023 Order']; and
(b) Urgent directions for full and proper access to and inspection of all Aircraft documents, records, including its maintenance record/storage preservation records.
2. By 05.07.2023 Order, this Court had passed the following interim directions :-
'..20.1 Therefore, with a view to obviate any further losses, the following directions are being passed:
(i) The Petitioners, their employees, agents, officers and/or representatives shall be permitted by the Respondent/DGCA and the appropriate Airport Authorities to access the Airport(s) where the 30 Aircrafts are parked [details of the Aircraft(s) is reproduced in the table in paragraph 3.2 herein] inter alia to inspect their respective Aircrafts, within the next 3 days;
(ii) The Petitioners, their employees, agents, officers and/or representatives shall be permitted to carry out inspection and all maintenance tasks of the Aircraft, its engines and other parts and components, of all 30 Aircrafts [as are set forth in table at paragraph 3.2 herein],at least twice every month, until the final disposal of the Writ Petitions;
(iii) Respondent/GoAir, its directors, employees, agents, officers and or representatives or the IRP/RP(s) or any person acting on their behalf, are hereby restrained from removing, replacing, taking out any accessories, parts, components or spares, etc. or any relevant operational or other Manuals /records, documentation from any of the 30 Aircraft, except with prior written approval of the Lessor of such Aircraft.'
3. Paragraph 20.1 of the 05.07.2023 Order, was modified by a Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 12.07.2023 [hereinafter referred to as the 'DB Order'] The relevant extract reads is below:-
'16. In the meantime, direction (ii) contained in paragraph No. 20.1 of the impugned judgement is modified to the extent that GoAir, through RP, is permitted to carry out all maintenance tasks of the thirty subject aircrafts, their engines and other parts and components, which are parked at various airports, with due permissions mandated under extant rules/ law. The Lessors are also free to carry out periodic monthly inspections of the aforesaid aircrafts in accordance with law.'
4. A challenge to the DB Order was dismissed on 07.08.2023 by the Supreme Court in SLP(C) No.16762-69/2023 directing:
'1 Proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution are pending before a Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi. The petitions are being argued on a day to day basis. The jurisdictional issues which are sought to be raised in these proceedings can be addressed before the High Court.
2. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.'
5. This Court also issued directions including on 28.07.2023 maintaining status quo in respect of the handling/non-revenue flights of the Aircraft(s).
6. During the course of final hearing of the Petitions, some of the Petitioners/Lessors have been constrained to file interim applications seeking urgent directions including for modification of the orders already passed by this Court. Although the prayers in these Applications are different, the essential grievance of the Petitioners/Lessors emanate from orders of inspection and maintenance of the Aircraft's which form subject matters of the petitions pending before this Court [hereinafter referred to as the 'Aircraft'].
6.1 The Petitioners/Lessors appearing in W.P.(C) 6569/2023, W.P.(C) 6626/2023, W.P.(C) 7214/2023, W.P.(C) 7369/2023, W.P.(C) 7773/2023, W.P.(C) 8088/2023, W.P.(C) 9594/2023, W.P.(C) 9990/2023, W.P.(C) 9991/2023, W.P.(C) 10327/2023, W.P.(C) 10386/2022 [hereinafter referred to as '
Union of India v. P.T. Anklesaria
S. Shanmugavel Nadar v. State of T.N.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for proper inspection and maintenance of aircraft, as defined in the lease agreements and governed by the Aircraft Rules, 1937 and the Air....
Inherent powers under Section 151 CPC may be invoked to admit additional evidence in interlocutory proceedings if the evidence is relevant to the controversy, assists in the ends of justice, and does....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court may not permit the filing of additional documents at a belated stage if it would only protract the case, as established by the princ....
A lease under public authority automatically vests in the successor post-termination, emphasizing the duty of the State to uphold constitutional fairness in contractual obligations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the time limit for inspection of documents as prescribed by the amended Rule 15 of Order XI C.P.C. is 'at or before the settlement of issues,'....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.