IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Shalinder Kaur, JJ.
Naushad Ali Through Perokar Sahajad Ali - Appellant
Versus
Uoi & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(Criminal) No. 2778 of 2023, CRL.M.A. No. 26003 of 2023
Decided On : 20-02-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issuance and confirmation of detention order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. challenges raised against legality of detention. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. government's counterarguments on detention justification. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. purpose and ambit of preventive detention laws. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. requirement of prompt execution in detention orders. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. explaining delay in execution of the detention order. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. petitioner's conduct regarding notification and service. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. examination of delay attribution to petitioner. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 9. possession of licenses and their impact on detention. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 10. collecting information before detention order issuance. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 11. breach of bail conditions as a factor for detention. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 12. delay in providing the detention order. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 13. serving detention order in custody. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 14. final conclusion and dismissal of the petition. (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
JUDGMENT
Shalinder Kaur, J. - Under assail is the preventive detention order dated 25.02.2022 issued by the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Cell [in short "PITNDPS Cell"], under Section 3 (1) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 [in short "PITNDPS Act"] and confirmed by Central Government, fixed the period of detention of one year from the date of detention i.e, 25.02.2022 under the provisions of Section 9 (6) of PITNDPS Act so as to prevent the petitioner from engaging in illicit trafficking of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances in future.
Detention order and proceedings therein:-
2. After passing of the detention order F. No. U-11011/03/2022-PINTNDS dated 25.02.2022 by Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, Joint Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (PITNDPS Unit), Sh. Naresh Kumar Deputy Secretary (PITNDPS Unit) informed Director General of Police, Uttarakhand, Dehradun to take immediate necessary action to serve the detention order upon Naushad Ali S/o Late Noor Hasan R/o Bahari Kila, Kasba-Landhora Teh-Roorkee, District-Haridwar (Uttrakhand). The said communication also contained other directions with respect to the detention of the petitioner. On 25.02.2022, the Joint Secretary had also formulated the grounds on which detention order had been issued to the petitioner wherein he specifically mentioned that he had gone through the facts and other material presented by the sponsoring authority, Narcotics Control Bureau ((hereinafter referred as NCB), Sub Zonal Unit, Dehradun.
3. The facts submitted before the Joint Secretary are as under:
4. On 31.01.2021, at around 19:30 hrs, an information was received by NCB Dehradun, from Drug Inspector, Haridwar that they had recovered a significant number of medicines restricted under NDPS Act from M/s Shaad Medical Store, Landhaura, Roorkee and detained one person namely Naushad Ali. The case was to be handed over to NCB for further investigation. Thereafter a team of officers from NCB reached the Police Station Kotwali, Mangalour at around 22:30 hours. The Drug Inspector handed over the petitioner and the recovered narcotic drugs along with a detailed inspection report to NCB at Police Station Kotwali. Drug Inspector disclosed that at the time of search of Shaad Medical Store, the petitioner failed to produce a stock register and sale bills of the drugs. The report further disclosed that huge quantities of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances were recovered from the possession of the petitioner which was in contravention of Section 8 of the NDPS act punishable under Section 22 / 27A/29 of NDPS Act, the details of
Haradhan Saha v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
S.K. Nizamuddin v. State of West Bengal.
Bhawarlal Ganeshmalji v. State of Tamil Nadu.
T.A Abdul Rahman v. State of Kerala
Yumman Ongbi Lembi Leima v. State of Manipur & Ors.
Vijay Narain Singh v. State of Bihar; 1984 SCC (Cri.) 361
Ameena Begum v. State of Telangana
Detention orders under the PITNDPS Act can be upheld when communicated timely and justified despite delays in arrest, emphasizing the subjective satisfaction of authorities against habitual offenders....
The main legal point established is that in preventive detention, prompt action is crucial, and the detaining authority must consider all vital facts influencing the decision to detain. Unreasonable ....
Preventive detention requires strict compliance with statutory safeguards and justifications for delay, ensuring protection against arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.