Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
MOHD YOUSUF WANI
Abdul Hameed @ Meedhu – Appellant
Versus
Union territory of J&K through principal Secretary to Government, Home Department – Respondent
Judgment :
Mohd Yousuf wani, J.
1. Impugned in the instant petition, having been filed in terms of Article 226 of the Constitution of India is the order of detention bearing No. PITNDPS 13 of 2025 dated 15.03.2025, passed by respondent No.2 i.e the Divisional Commissioner, Rail-Head, Jammu, while invoking his powers U/s 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as PITNDPS Act for short) r/w SRO-247 dated 27.07.1988, whereby the petitioner/detenu was directed to be detained and lodged in District Jail Rajouri, for a period to be specified by the Government with a view to prevent him from engaging in Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
2. The petitioner–detenu, through his wife Naseema Begum, aged about 29 years, has sought the quashment of the impugned detention order dated 15.03.2025 by issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, inter alia, on the grounds that same is violative of his guarantees under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India. That firstly, there was no legal justification for his detention on the mere allegations of his involvement in certain FIRs in which he
The detention order was quashed due to vagueness in grounds and violation of constitutional rights under Article 22(5), alongside significant delays in execution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for compelling reasons to justify preventive detention under the PITNDPS Act, 1988, and the importance of complying with procedural....
Preventive detention requires a clear link between past conduct and future risk; failure to communicate grounds in an understandable language violates constitutional rights.
Preventive detention must rely upon proximate, live material; unexplained administrative delay, non-supply of foundational documents, and the use of detention as a punitive substitute for regular bai....
The importance of subjective satisfaction in detention matters and the limitations of judicial review.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
