AMIT BANSAL
Sapna Paul – Appellant
Versus
Rohin Paul – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Amit Bansal, J. - The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner (Wife) impugning the judgment dated 1st November, 2019, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Appellate Court), South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi whereby, the judgment dated 16th November, 2016, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Trial Court), Mahila Court, South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the Trial Court.
2. Vide the judgment dated 16th November, 2016, the Trial Court had allowed the application filed by the Wife under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) and directed the respondent (Husband) to pay a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- per month towards maintenance as well as compensation under Section 22 of the DV Act to the Wife.
3. Assailing the impugned judgment passed by the Appellate Court, the Wife filed the present petition along with an application for condonation of delay and an application for stay of the proceedings before the Trial Court. Vide detailed order dated 22nd July, 2022, the application for condonation of delay was allowed by the predecessor bench.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.