IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Prem Narayan Singh
Sunita Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Pradeep Ghosh – Respondent
ORDER :
Prem Narayan Singh, J.
With the consent of the parties, heard finally.
1. This criminal revision has been filed by the petitioner under Section 397 of Cr.P.C., 1973, being aggrieved by the judgment dated 03.03.2022, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Indore, in Cr.A. No.178/2019, for setting aside or modifying the impugned order whereby the learned Judge has allowed the appeal filed by respondent/husband and order dated 16.05.2019, passed by Learned JMFC, Indore granting interim monetary relief amounting Rs.20,000/- per month under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as "D.V. Act"), has been set aside.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the parties was solemnized on 08.02.2011 as per the Hindu Rites and Rituals. The petitioner had already given birth to a daughter Arohi out of her previous wedlock. The respondent was very well aware about the first marriage of the petitioner and also aware about daughter from first marriage. At the time of marriage the respondent was working in ICICI Bank while the petitioner was working in Employees Provident Fund Corporation. Soon after the marriage, behaviour of the respond
Sunita Kachhwaha Vs. Anil Kachhwaha
Reema Sulkan Vs. Sumer Singh Sulkan
Sanjaysinh Ramrao Chavan Vs. Dattatray Gulabrao Phalke
A wife must establish a prima facie case of domestic violence to be entitled to interim maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act, considering both parties' financial statuses.
A husband must ensure his wife’s financial support and maintain her standard of living unless he proves his inability to earn, as emphasized under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and the Domestic Violence Act.
The obligation of a husband to maintain his wife under Section 125 of the CrPC is a statutory duty, and the assessment of maintenance must consider the husband's income and the wife's financial needs....
A wife's earning does not preclude her from receiving maintenance; courts must assess the overall financial situation and standard of living.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion in modifying maintenance orders and the consideration of the financial status and obligations of the parties.
Maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. must reflect the financial status of the husband and the needs of the wife, ensuring adequate support for her living expenses.
The determination of maintenance in matrimonial disputes depends on the financial status of the parties and the standard of living to which the aggrieved person is accustomed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.