SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 90

DHARMESH SHARMA
Jagjit Singh Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
Roop Rani Mehra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sonal Anand and Ms. Surbhi Singh, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Awijit Paliwal, Advocate with Respondent in Person.

JUDGMENT

1. The present Revision Petition is preferred under Section 25-B (8)[Section 25-B (8) - No appeal or second appeal shall lie against an order for the recovery of possession of any premises made by the Controller in accordance with the procedure specified in this section:
Provided that the High Court may, for the purpose of satisfying itself that an order made by the Controller under this section is according to law, call for the records of the case and pass such order in respect thereto as it thinks fit.] of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958[DRC Act] by the petitioner, assailing the impugned order dated 23.05.2015 passed by learned CCJ-cum- ARC-I (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi[ARC] in the Eviction Petition titled `Smt. Roop Rani Mehra, (Senior Citizen) v. Sh. Jagjit Singh Bhatia', bearing No. E-342/2013, whereby the application of the petitioner, who was tenant in respect of the premises in question, seeking leave to defend under Section 25-B (4)& (5) of the DRC Act was dismissed and an eviction order was passed. It is pertinent to mention that the respondent/landlady expired on 25.05.2018 and her legal heirs now represent her legal interests in the matter.

FACTUAL BAC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top