SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Manju – Appellant
Versus
Shivprasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.
CM APPL. 7623/2023 (Condonation of delay)
1. The present Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 61 days' delay in filing the present appeal.
2. For the reasons and grounds stated in the present application, the delay of 61 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.
CM APPL. 7624/2023 (Condonation of delay)
4. The present Application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 8 days' delay in re-filing the present appeal.
5. For the reasons and grounds stated in the present application, the delay of 8 days in re-filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
6. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 47/2023
7. It is the child who suffers the most casualty in custody battle because even if either parent wins, the child loses everything due to polarization of familial relations. Merely having a child does not make one a `parent', rathe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.