Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
BIREN VAISHNAV, MAULIK J. SHELAT
DIPAL, D/O AMRABHAI BHARAI, W/O MIHIRBHAI RAYKA – Appellant
Versus
MIHIRBHAI GANDABHAI RAYKA – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J.)
1 This First Appeal under the Guardians & Wards Act, 1890, has been filed by the original -respondent – mother, challenging the judgement and order dated 10.01.2024 of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gandhinagar in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 07 of 2003. By the aforesaid judgement and order, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gandhinagar, allowed the application of the respondent herein, the father, and granted the custody of son and daughter.
2 Facts in brief are as under:
2.1 The parties shall be referred to as the applicant-father, who is the respondent in this appeal and the respondent mother, who is the appellant herein.
2.2 The applicant-father filed an application under Sec.7 and 25 of the Guardians & Wards Act, praying that the custody of son Vedant and daughter Dhyana be granted to him. According to the applicant, it was his case that he was an Officer of the Indian Revenue Service, who had married the respondent on 06.07.2010. Out of the wedlock, son Vedant was bo
The paramount consideration in custody cases is the welfare of the children, not financial status or character allegations against a parent.
The welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in custody disputes, and the court must ensure judicial discipline and adherence to judicial discipline.
The paramount consideration in child custody cases is the welfare of the child, taking into account the child's ordinary comfort, health, education, and favorable surroundings, as well as the human t....
The welfare of the child prevails over the natural guardianship rights, as established by the father's inability to demonstrate he could serve the child's best interests compared to the established c....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article