RAJIV SHAKDHER, GIRISH KATHPALIA
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Indian Evangelical Team – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)
CM No. 63257/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking
condonation of delay of 457 days in re-filing the appeal]
1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay, in re-filing the appeal, on behalf of the appellant/revenue.
1.1. According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of four hundred and fifty-seven (457) days in re-filing the appeal.
2. Since we are taking up the appeal for hearing on merits, the delay in re-filing is condoned.
3. The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
ITA 713/2023
4. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15.
5. Via the instant appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 24.03.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short "Tribunal"].
6. Mr Abhishek Maratha, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue, fairly informs us that the questions proposed in the instant appeal are identical to the questions that were raised by the appellant/revenue in ITA Nos. 353/2023, 360/2023, and 185/2022 and 169/2003.
7. Insofar as ITA No. 353/2023 and ITA No. 360/2023 are concerned, t
The principle of condonation of delay and the requirement for a substantial question of law to arise for consideration in an appeal.
The court has the discretion to allow condonation of delay in re-filing appeals and may grant liberty to file a writ petition based on previous judgments.
The absence of substantial question of law can lead to the closure of appeals.
The court's decision was influenced by its previous ruling on a similar issue, indicating the importance of consistency in judicial decisions.
The court's decision emphasized that no substantial question of law arose for consideration, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.
The court's decision was based on the absence of a substantial question of law for consideration in the appeal.
The court's decision was influenced by the absence of incriminating material in the mentioned Assessment Years and the coverage of the issue by the judgment of the coordinate bench of the Court and t....
The court has the discretion to condone delay and may dispose of appeals with a caveat for further steps against the respondent/assessee in case of any deletion of substantial additions.
The court's decision was influenced by the specific judgments covering the issue and the absence of substantial questions of law for consideration.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year and to file appeals based on the tax effect in the relevant assess....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.