SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 6033

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
Vinod Kumar & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State (NCT) of Delhi) & Anr. - Respondents
Cr.M.C. 9100 of 2023 & Crl. M.A. 33976 of 2023
Decided On : 22-12-2023.

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Mr. Kartik Venu, Mr. Vaibhav Suri and Ms. Ariana Ahluwalia, Advocates, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State.

The court upheld the use of video-conferencing for vulnerable witnesses, emphasizing that it does not infringe on the accused's right to a fair trial while addressing the unique challenges faced by foreign victims of sexual assault.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - High Court of Delhi Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2021 - Recording of evidence of vulnerable witnesses through video conferencing - The court upheld the validity of video conferencing for the testimony of a foreign citizen victim, emphasizing the need to balance the rights of the accused with the victim's trauma and the importance of fair trial principles. (Paras 7, 11, 22, 56)

(B) Vulnerable Witnesses - Definition and Treatment - The court recognized that vulnerability is not tied to the educational background of the witness but rather to the psychological impact of sexual assault, necessitating special considerations in recording testimony. (Paras 46, 49)

(C) Fair Trial - The court concluded that allowing video conferencing does not infringe upon the accused's right to a fair trial, as it provides an effective means for cross-examination while ensuring the victim's comfort and dignity. (Paras 54, 58)

JUDGMENT

INDEX TO THE JUDGMENT

FACTUAL BACKDROP

IMPUGNED ORDER

CONTENTIONS RAISED BEFORE THIS COURT

WHETHER THE IMPUGNED ORDER VIOLATES THE MANDATE OF `HIGH COURT OF DELHI RULES FOR VIDEO CONFERENCING FOR COURTS 2021'?

WHETHER PERMITTING THE PROSECUTRIX TO TESTIFY VIA TWO-WAY VIDEO-CONFERENCING WILL VIOLATE THE ACCUSED'S RIGHT TO FAIR TRIAL?

A. Judicial Precedents And Directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court Qua Vulnerable Witnesses: How the Journey Started

B. Recording of Evidence of Vulnerable Witnesses: Scheme of Delhi High Court.

C. Judicial Precedents Qua Recording of Evidence of Witnesses Through Video-Conferencing

D. Embracing the Technology while Balancing the Rights of Accused and Victim in a Criminal Trial

E. Evidence via Video-Conferencing viz.-a-viz Recording of Demeanour of Witness

F. Whether an `Educated Woman Hailing From Developed Country' Cannot Be Covered Under the Definition of `Vulnerable Witness'?

CONCLUSION

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.

1. The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C.') has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, seeking quashing and setting aside of order dated 09.12.2023, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (SFTC)- New Delhi, Patiala House District Courts, New Delhi, in Sessions Case No. 379/2019.

2. The petitioners Vinod Kumar and Rajesh Kumar, who are facing trial in an alleged case of gang rape alongwith one another accused Anil Kumar, seek direction from this Court, to the learned Trial Court, to compel the physical presence of the prosecutix for her examination and cross-examination.

FACTUAL BACKDROP

3. The sequence of events, prompting the filing of present petition before this Court, is that a complaint was received by the office of Senior Superintendent of Police, District Kangra, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, by the prosecutrix `X', aged about 23 years, a citizen of United States of America, who had disclosed that she had arrived in India, at the Indira Gandhi International Airport, Terminal 3, from Chicago, USA, on 15.05.2019 at 6:40 pm. It was further stated in the complaint that she had to catch a flight from Delhi to Dharamshala at 6:30 am on the next day i.e. 16.05.2019, and thus, she had slept overnight at the airport. However, the next morning, she had unfortunately missed her flight to Dharamshala. After receiving her luggage from the concerned airlines, the prosecutrix had stepped out of the Airport, where she had encountered two persons i.e. `Lal Singh' and `Kumar' (as mentioned in the complaint),who had represented themselves as taxi drivers and had offered to help her in getting a bus ticket for Dharamshala. The prosecutrix had accordingly sat in their vehicle, and after about 5-10 mins, they had stopped the car near a market and had got a bus ticket for her, for which she had paid them Rs.10,000/- and USD 20. Thereafter, these two persons had convinced the prosecutrix that since the bus was scheduled to leave from Kashmere Gate at 6:50 pm, she should stay in a hotel as it was 10:30 am in the morning. Thereafter, they had taken her to a hotel in Vasant Kunj New Delhi. It is alleged that these accused persons had entered the room of the prosecutrix, and had then committed rape upon her. One of these accused had also taken the ring that was worn by the prosecutrix. Thereafter, in the evening, they had offered to drop the prosecutrix at Kashmere Gate, and on their way, the prosecutrix had contacted LHA Charitable Trust at Mcleodganj, Himachal Pradesh and had made accused namely `Kumar' to talk to that person. Thereafter, the accused persons had dropped the prosecutrix near Patiala House Courts and from there, she had travelled in a taxi to Kashmere Gate. On boarding the bus, she had found that the bus ticket handed over to her by the accused persons was fake. It is stated that thereafter, she had to board an ordinary bus for Dharamshala, and she had reached her destination in the morning of 17.05.2019. On 20.05.2019, the prosec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top