SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1679

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
Sukhmanjit Singh Dhindsa – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CRM-M No. 59290 of 2023
Decided On : 28-11-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Ms. Shivya Sehgal, Ms. Navreet Kaur Barnala AAG, Punjab

The court affirmed that video conferencing is permissible under the Criminal Procedure Code for recording evidence, ensuring the right to a fair trial for complainants unable to appear physically.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 - Video conferencing - Petition for quashing order dismissing application for recording statement via video conferencing due to diplomatic issues - Evidence of complainant required for fair trial under Article 21 - Directions issued for recording evidence through video conferencing from Canada. (Paras 1, 8, 10)

(B) Fair Trial - Right to fair trial includes complainant's right to be heard - Depriving complainant of opportunity to depose violates Article 21. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a complainant residing in Canada, filed an application for recording his statement via video conferencing due to diplomatic issues preventing his travel to India. The trial Court dismissed the application, leading to this petition.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that the trial Court's dismissal of the application caused grave prejudice to the petitioner and violated his right to a fair trial.

Issues: The key issues were whether video conferencing could be utilized in this case and if the dismissal of the application was justified given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that existing provisions allow for recording evidence via video conferencing, especially when physical attendance is not feasible. This is essential for ensuring justice and upholding the right to a fair trial.

Result: Petition allowed, orders set aside and directions issued for recording evidence via video conferencing.

Judgment

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the impugned order dated 25.08.2023 (Annexure P-3) vide which the application filed by the petitioner for getting his statement recorded by way of video conferencing through server room at the Civil Court, Dasuya has been illegally and erroneously dismissed in FIR No.144 dated 13.09.2019 registered under Section 408 IPC at the Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur as well as order dated 25.10.2023 (Annexure P-4) whereby evidence of the prosecution has been closed by court order.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner is the complainant in the aforementioned FIR. The trial of the case is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dasuya. The petitioner is permanent resident of Canada and at the time of the recording of the prosecution witness, an application was filed by the learned additional public prosecutor for recording the statement of the petitioner through video conferencing facility. The learned trial Court initially allowed the application vide order dated 11.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) and directed recording evidence of the petitioner as per the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra Vs. Dr. Praful B. Desai 2003 (2) RCR (Criminal) 770. However, evidence of the petitioner could not be recorded through the Coordinators at the Indian and Canadian Embassy due to frayed diplomatic relations between both the countries at that time. The petitioner once again requested the learned trial Court by filing application on 25.08.2023 (Annexure P-2), however, the said application was dismissed by the order of even date. On 09.10.2023, counsel for the petitioner sought adjournment on the ground that the diplomatic relationship between the India and Canada were strained and therefore, he was not able to get visa to visit India for recording his evidence. The learned trial Court granted adjournment only for two weeks vide order dated 09.10.2023 without considering the ongoing diplomatic standoff between Indian and Canadian governments and the fact that the petitioner was not in a position to travel to India. In spite of aforesaid unavoidable circumstances, the trial Court directed the prosecution to conclude evidence on 25.10.2023 either through video conferencing of the petitioner or in the court, as last opportunity. On 25.10.2023, the learned trial Court closed the evidence of the prosecution by order and posted the case for 02.11.2023 for recording statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the record of the case with their able assistance, the case is taken up for final disposal.

4. In Part H, Volume V, Chapter 1-H of the High Court Rules and Orders Model Rules on Video Conferencing were inserted in terms of the Rules framed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The terms ‘Coordinator’, ‘Court Point’, ‘Court User’ and ‘Designated Video Conferencing Software’ have been defined under Rule 2 of the said Rules. Sub rule (viii) of Rule 2 defines ‘Exceptional Circumstances’ which include a pandemic, natural calamities, circumstances implicating law and order and matters relating to the safety of the accused and witnesses. The general principles governing video conferencing have been provided under Rule 3 and what kind of apparatus or devices can be used for conducting proceedings by video conferencing at Court Point and at the Remote Point, as has been provided under Rule 4. The provision for a Coordinator has been made both at the Court Point and the Remote Point from where the required person is to be examined or heard. The relevant Rules are reproduced as under:-

“5. Preparatory Arrangements

5.1 There shall be a Coordinator both at the Court Point and at the Remo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top