IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Bansal, J.
Directorate General of Gst Intelligence - Appellant
Versus
Chaman Goel - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 2791 of 2023 & Crl.M.A. 10475 of 2023 (Stay) and Crl.M.C. 2792 of 2023 & Crl.M.A. 10477 of 2023 (Stay) etc.
Decided On : 19-01-2024
GST Fraud - Anticipatory Bail - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) - Section 132(1)(b) and (c) - Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) - SLP (Crl.) No. 4212-4213 of 2019 titled State of Gujarat v. Choodamani Parmeshwaran Iyer
Fact of the Case:
The accused were involved in a GST fraud scheme worth Rs.200 crores by fraudulently obtaining Input Tax Credit. The accused attempted to leave the country in violation of bail conditions.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accused were not entitled to anticipatory bail due to their involvement in a large-scale economic fraud and their attempt to flee the country.
Issues: The main issue was whether the accused were entitled to anticipatory bail in light of their involvement in a significant GST fraud scheme and their attempt to violate bail conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the accused's involvement in a large-scale economic fraud and their attempt to flee the country rendered them ineligible for anticipatory bail.
Final Decision: The anticipatory bail granted to the accused was cancelled, and the petitions filed by the DGGI were allowed. The petition filed by the accused seeking anticipatory bail was dismissed.
JUDGMENT
1. CRL.M.C.2791/2023 and CRL.M.C.2792/2023 have been filed on behalf of the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) seeking setting aside of the common order dated 21st December, 2022, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, granting anticipatory bail to the accused Chaman Goel and Chirag Goel.
2. CRL.M.C.6431/2023 has been filed on behalf of the accused Chaman Goel seeking setting aside of the order dated 29th August, 2023, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, whereby the anticipatory bail granted to Chaman Goel has been cancelled on the ground of violation of condition of anticipatory bail.
3. Brief facts, as agitated by the DGGI, are as follows:
3.1. The officers of DRI, Gandhidham and DGGI, acting on intelligence, intercepted 21 containers carrying smoking mixtures from Mundra Port, Gujarat on 3rd October, 2022. The samples taken therefrom were sent to the Central Revenues Control Laboratory (CRCL), Kandla, wherein it was revealed that the aforesaid smoking mixture was a spurious product and not fit for human consumption.
3.2. Investigation was started and summons were issued to the exporter company, M/s Harsha International. However, the proprietor of M/s Harsha International, Jitender Kumar, did not comply with the aforesaid summons.
3.3. During search of the registered premises of the exporter M/s Harsha International, it was revealed that no business activity relating to export was being carried out and a kirana store was being operated by the father of Jitender Kumar from the registered place of business.
3.4. During the course of investigation, it was found that M/s Radiant Traders, the manufacturers of smoking mixtures, had supplied their smoking mixture to M/s Harsha International, who exported the same. Upon search, it was found that no business activity was being conducted from the registered premises of M/s Radiant Traders and no goods or plant or machinery was found at their premises.
3.5. Subsequently, statement of the proprietor of M/s Radiant Traders, Manish Goyal, was recorded under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act), wherein he admitted that he was acting at the behest of Chirag Goel.
3.6. The accused Manish Goyal was arrested on 25th November, 2022 under the allegations of having committed offences under Section 132(1)(b) and (c) of the CGST Act.
3.7. The residential premises of the accused Chaman Goel, situated at Kamla Nagar, Delhi were searched on 7th December, 2022 and unaccounted cash to the tune of Rs. 99,95,000/-was found therein, in respect of which no explanation was given by the father of Chaman Goel, who was present there. Furthermore, from the CCTV footage of the premises, it was revealed that Chaman Goel had absconded from the house.
3.8. The accused Manish Goyal preferred a bail application before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, which was allowed vide order dated 21st December, 2022 and Manish Goyal was released on regular bail.
3.9. Chirag Goel and Chaman Goel were summoned by the DGGI, however, they did not join investigation and instead moved an application for grant of anticipatory bail, which was allowed by a common order dated 21st December, 2022 and both Chirag Goel and Chaman Goel were granted anticipatory bail subject to certain conditions.
3.10. One of the conditions imposed therein was that the accused persons shall not leave the country without the permission of the court. Despite the aforesaid condition, Chaman Goel attempted to leave the country. Consequently, an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail was filed on behalf of the DGGI which was allowed by the learned ASJ vide order dated 29th August, 2023 and the anticipatory bail was cancelled.
3.11. This Court had granted interim protection to Chaman Goel vide order dated 6th September, 2023 passed in CRL.M.C. 6431/2023 filed by Chaman Go
The judgment established that involvement in a large-scale economic fraud and attempts to violate bail conditions can render an accused ineligible for anticipatory bail.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the accused's cooperation in the investigation and clean antecedents in granting anticipatory bail, and highlighted the significance of complying wi....
Anticipatory bail granted as petitioners cooperated with investigation, lack of prior offenses, and no necessity for custodial interrogation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of previous permission from the Commissioner to prosecute under the GST Act and the discretion of the court in granting anticipator....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a liberal interpretation of anticipatory bail provisions, considering the principles of Article 21 of the Constitution and the nature ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that economic offences, especially those related to tax evasion under the CGST Act, are considered serious and require a different approach in the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a determination of tax liability before arrest and prosecution, and the importance of assessing the nature and gravity of the accusati....
The seriousness of economic offences does not alone justify bail denial; factors like trial delay and personal circumstances must also be considered.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.