SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 333

REKHA PALLI, RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Anoop Kumar Upadhyay – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Advocate, for the Petitioners.
Mr. B.S. Jarial, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Rekha Palli, J. (Oral)

1. The present writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dated 02.12.2022 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in O.A. 4677/2018. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has allowed the Original Application filed by the respondent by quashing the order dated 17.12.2018, whereby a sum of Rs. 9,01,173/- was sought to be recovered from him on account of the purported excess payment made to him during the period between 01.07.2011 to 30.11.2018.

2. The respondent joined the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) as a Junior Engineer on 13.04.1982 and was, on 18.08.2009 promoted as an Assistant Engineer (Civil) on ad hoc basis. In 2010, the respondent appeared in the promotional departmental examination but was unable to clear the same but was still granted an increment w.e.f., 01.07.2011, which learned counsel for the petitioners submits, was payable only to those employees who had cleared the departmental examination. Upon realising this mistake, the petitioners, after verifying the position regarding the respondent having not cleared the departmental exam, proceeded to is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top