SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 102

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Ashok Kumar Shivpuri – Appellant
Versus
Ashok B Chajjar, Cmd, Arihant Enterprises – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Manan Bansal and Mr. Kanishk Rana, Advocates, for the Petitioner.

JUDGMENT

1. The Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Orders dated 19.06.2023 and 06.09.2019 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in Revision Petition No.3152/2018 whereby the Consumer Forum has allowed the revision petition in part in favour of the Petitioner herein by enhancing of the compensation from Rs.25,000/- awarded by the State Commission to Rs.3 lakhs.

2. A perusal of the material on record shows that attracted by an advertisement of the Respondent/Arihant Enterprises, the Petitioner herein booked a flat in one of its projects called `Arihant Sparsh' in Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

3. It is stated that an agreement for sale was entered into on 25.05.2010 and by May, 2011, that the Petitioner paid 97% cost of the flat. It is stated by the Petitioner that there was a delay in handing over possession and the possession was handed over to the Petitioner only on 11.04.2012. It is stated that after taking possession, the Petitioner pointed out various deficiencies in the flat. Since the deficiencies were not rectified, the Petitioner approached the District Consumer Redressal Forum, Thane, Navi Mumbai claiming compensation.

4. The District Forum v





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top