SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 206

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
Asus India Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
The Gst Officer, Ward-91, Zone-8 Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 1729 of 2024 & CM APPL. 7137 of 2024
Decided On : 06-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kumar Visalaksh, Mr. Udit Jain, Mr. Arihant and Ms. Adhya M, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocate for GST Officer.

IMPORTANT POINT
Granting an opportunity for response and personal hearing before adjudication based on the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

Headnote:

Rule 142 - Show Cause Notice - The court granted the petitioner two weeks' time to file a response to the show cause notice and directed the proper officer to provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before adjudicating the notice.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged a show cause notice proposing a demand against them, alleging non-compliance with Rule 142 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition, granting the petitioner two weeks' time to respond to the show cause notice and directing the proper officer to provide a personal hearing before adjudication.

Issues: Non-compliance with Rule 142 (1) and absence of proper officer's signatures on the show cause notice.

Ratio Decidendi: Granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond and have a personal hearing before adjudication, based on the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner two weeks' time to file a response to the show cause notice and directing the proper officer to provide a personal hearing before adjudication.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner impugns show cause notice dated 08.12.2023 whereby a demand is proposed to be created against the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent- proper officer has not complied with the provisions of Rule 142 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017 by giving an opportunity to the petitioner to respond in Form GST/DRC-01A or to pay the amount of tax. He further submits that the show cause notice does not bear any signatures either digital or physical of the proper officer and has been merely uploaded on the portal.

3. He, however, without prejudice submits that the time to respond to the show cause notice has expired on 08.01.2024. He, without prejudice prays that an opportunity be given to the petitioner to file a response to the show cause notice reserving the right of the petitioner to raise all available pleas in law, inter-alia, non-compliance of Rule 142 (1A) as also the validity of the show cause notice as same does not contain any Document Identification Number (DIN) or signatures of the proper officer.

4. Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, petition is disposed of granting petitioner two weeks' time to file a response to the show cause notice dated 08.12.2023. The proper officer shall give an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter adjudicate the show cause notice in accordance with law.

5. Petition is accordingly disposed of. It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor commented on the contentions of either party. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top