IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
M/s Samayshristi Enterprises - Appellant
Versus
Superintendent, Range-31, Gst Division, New Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2912 of 2024
Decided On : 27-02-2024
GST Registration - Cancellation of Registration - The court set aside the order rejecting the application for cancellation of GST registration, stating that it lacked details or reasons, and allowed the petitioner's application for cancellation with effect from the date of application. The petitioner was directed to comply with the requirements of Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017 and furnish the requisite details. The respondents were not precluded from taking steps for recovery of any tax, penalty, or interest due in accordance with the law.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought cancellation of GST registration due to financial stringency and closure of business activities. The application was rejected for failure to attend a personal hearing or submit a requisite reply against the query raised.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the order rejecting the application and allowed the cancellation of GST registration with effect from the date of application. The petitioner was directed to comply with the requirements of Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017 and furnish the requisite details. The respondents were not precluded from taking steps for recovery of any tax, penalty, or interest due.
Issues: Rejection of application for cancellation of GST registration, compliance with Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017, and recovery of tax, penalty, or interest due.
Ratio Decidendi: The order rejecting the application lacked details or reasons and was set aside. The petitioner's application for cancellation of GST registration was allowed with effect from the date of application, subject to compliance with Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017. The respondents were not precluded from taking steps for recovery of any tax, penalty, or interest due.
Final Decision: The order rejecting the application for cancellation of GST registration was set aside, and the petitioner's application for cancellation was allowed with effect from the date of application. The petitioner was directed to comply with the requirements of Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017 and furnish the requisite details. The respondents were not precluded from taking steps for recovery of any tax, penalty, or interest due.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral) - Petitioner impugns order dated 03.01.2024 whereby the application seeking cancellation of GST registration of the Petitioner has been rejected.
2. Vide impugned order dated 03.01.2024, petitioner's application seeking cancellation of GST registration was rejected for the following reason:
"The taxpayer neither attended personal hearing on stipulated date and time nor submitted requisite reply against the query raised. Accordingly, request for cancellation of GST registration is rejected under the provision laid down in Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017."
3. Petitioner was engaged in business of trading of ferrous waste, scrap as well as stainless steel and possessed GST registration.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that due to financial stringency to continue business, the petitioner had closed down all business activities and was no longer interest in continuing the business. Petitioner filed an application for cancellation of GST registration w.e.f. 21.11.2023.
5. Pursuant to the application, show cause notice dated 22.11.2023 was issued by the respondents seeking additional information/clarification/documents for cancellation of registration stating "1. Basic Details - Others (Please specify) - Please provide/upload address for future correspondence other than mentioned in Principal place of Business. 2 Cancellation Details - Others (Please specify) - Please provide reconciliation of GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B along with GSTR 2A Vs. GSTR-3B."
6. As per petitioner, he submitted a response to the queries raised by the Respondent in compliance to the aforesaid notice.
7. Thereafter, impugned order dated 03.01.2024 rejected the application for cancellation of GST registration. The said order merely states "The taxpayer neither attended personal hearing on stipulated date and time nor submitted requisite reply against the query raised. Accordingly, request for cancellation of GST registration is rejected under the provision laid down in Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017."
8. In our view, order dated 03.01.2024 does not qualify as an order rejecting the application seeking cancellation of GST registration as the same is bereft of any details or reasons and accordingly the same cannot be sustained.
9. In view of the above the order dated 03.01.2024 is set aside. The application of the Petitioner seeking cancellation is allowed. The GST registration of the Petitioner shall now be treated as cancelled with effect from 21.11.2023 i.e., the date when the petitioner applied for cancellation of GST registration. Petitioner shall comply with the requirements of Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and furnish the requisite details.
10. It is clarified that Respondents are also not precluded from taking any steps for recovery of any tax, penalty or interest that may be due in respect of the subject firm in accordance with law.
11. Petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.
12. Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
A taxpayer has the right to seek cancellation of its GST registration after closing down its business, and the respondent must take steps for cancellation while allowing for further action if there i....
The court emphasizes the necessity of compliance with tax laws for registration restoration under GST, balancing lawful trade and statutory enforcement.
Administrative decisions regarding GST registration must reflect a proper application of mind, particularly when addressing notices and responses, ensuring fairness and adherence to procedural standa....
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect must be based on objective criteria and proper notice, and the proper officer must consider all relevant aspects before passing such orders.
A taxpayer is entitled to close the business and seek cancellation of GST registration, and cancellation with retrospective effect does not preclude authorities from instituting proceedings for viola....
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect should be based on objective criteria and warranted consequences, and the respondents are not precluded from taking steps for recovery of an....
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect requires objective criteria and consideration of consequences, and must be in accordance with the law and after providing an opportunity of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.