SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Amit Bansal, JJ.
M/s Siddhi Ferrous - Appellant
Versus
M/s Uppal Builders - Respondent
FAO(OS) (COMM) 277 of 2022, CM Nos. 41611-14 of 2022 & 51791 of 2022
Decided On : 21-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr Akshay Garish Ringe, Mr Ankit Shah, Mr Tarun Arora and Mr Siddhant Singh, Advocates, for the Appellant.
Mr Kartik Rai, Advocate along with Mr Balwinder Pal Singh Uppal, Director of Respondent.

IMPORTANT POINT
Enforcement of arbitral awards and the obligation to pay the awarded sum along with interest as per the terms of the award.

Headnote:

Arbitration - Award Sustained - Payment of Award Amount and Interest

Fact of the Case:

The appeal was filed against the judgment sustaining the award passed by the Arbitrator, requiring the appellant to pay the awarded sum along with interest to the respondent.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the judgment and directed the appellant to pay the principal sum along with simple interest and costs to the respondent by a specified date.

Issues: Enforcement of Arbitral Award, Payment of Award Amount and Interest

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the award and ordered the appellant to make the specified payments, taking into account the amount already received.

Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of with the direction for the appellant to pay the principal sum, interest, and costs to the respondent by a specified date.

JUDGMENT

[hysical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM Nos.41611/2022 & 41613/2022

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

FAO(OS) (COMM) 277/2022, CM Nos.41612/2022, 41614/2022 & 51791/2022

2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 12.05.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP(COMM) No. 357/2020.

3. The learned Single Judge, via the impugned judgment, has sustained the award dated 17.04.2014 passed by the learned Arbitrator. The net effect of the order passed by the learned Single Judge is that the sum awarded by the learned Arbitrator along with interest would have to be paid by the appellant.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties, briefly. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the appeal can be disposed of on the following terms:

(i) The principal sum amounting to Rs. 23,75,565/- will be paid along with simple interest at the rate of 7% per annum, commencing from 02.08.2011 till the date of payment.

(ii) In addition, thereto, costs of Rs. 1,00,000/- will be paid by the appellant to the respondent.

(iii) The aforementioned amounts will be paid by the appellant to the respondent on or before 30.04.2024.

(iv) Against the amounts mentioned in Clause (i) above, Rs. 10,00,000/- which has already been received, will stand adjusted in the first instance, against the interest and thereafter, against the principal amount.

5. It is ordered accordingly. The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Consequently, pending applications shall stand closed.

6. The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top