SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 393

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Manoj Jain, JJ.
Samim Akhtar - Appellant
Versus
The State & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(Cr) 587 of 2023
Decided On : 22-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mohammad Shoakat Hussain, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (crl) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Shivesh Kaushik and Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocates with SI Maninder Maan, for the Respondemts.
Mr. Charul Chaudhry, Advocate for R-6 to 9.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court's decision was based on the principle of habeas corpus and the obligation of the police to make continuous efforts to trace a missing person.

Headnote:

Habeas Corpus - Missing Minor - The court disposed of the writ petition seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the petitioner's missing daughter, directing the police to file a monthly status report and transfer the case to the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's daughter went missing and an FIR was registered, but she could not be traced despite extensive efforts by the police.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition, directing the police to file a monthly status report and transfer the case to the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit.

Issues: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for missing minor daughter.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that despite extensive efforts by the police, the missing girl could not be traced, and therefore directed the police to file a monthly status report and transfer the case to the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with directions for the police to file a monthly status report and transfer the case to the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit.

JUDGMENT (oral)

1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following prayer:-

    "a) to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus thereby directing the respondents to produce minor daughter of the petitioner namely Ms X who is in illegally confined/detained of the respondent Nos. 4 to 8, before this Hon'ble Court and after hearing her she be handed over to the petitioner;

    b) issue directions to the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to interrogate and arrest the respondent Nos. 4 to 8 in crime under the relevant provisions/sections;"

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that on 23.12.2022, petitioner's daughter went from her home and did not return. FIR No.936/2022 dated 23.12.2022, under Section 363 IPC was registered Police Station Prem Nagar. However, the police has not so far been able to find her.

3. Heard.

4. Notice issued.

5. Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent and has placed before this Court status report dated 09.01.2024. The same is taken on record.

6. As per status report, W/T message was flashed with the details of the missing girl. Information about the missing girl was also uploaded on ZipNet. Information was also sent to CBI, NCRB and missing cell. It is stated that despite all the possible efforts, the missing girl could not be traced out. It is also stated that the police would continue to make fresh efforts to find her out.

7. During further course of investigation, hue and cry notice were circulated in the area of nearby police station, ISBT, Railway Stations & all other important places. In order to trace the victim, the family members of the suspected person were examined on 12.05.2023, local enquiry was made and search of the victim was made.

8. As per status report, all the possible steps have been taken by the State to search the missing daughter of the petitioner however, no clue was found. The State has already registered FIR No. 936/2022 dated 23.12.2022, under Section 363 IPC. The respondent/State has also tried to locate suspect Rohit who is missing and not traceable.

9. In light of the aforesaid and since all possible efforts to trace out the missing girl have been made and the FIR is pending investigation, we hereby dispose of the present writ petition directing the concerned police officials to file a monthly status report before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate with advance copy to the petitioner and, if any, clue is found about the missing daughter of the petitioner, the same be communicated to the petitioner. It is directed that the missing girl be produced before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate as and when she is rescued.

10. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is also further directed to transfer the case to the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit (AHTU), Crime Branch and the said Branch is directed to file status report, as indicated above, before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.

11. With directions as aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top