SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 567

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Prem Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Brijesh Kumar Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for State with SI Sanjeet, PS Malviya Nagar.

JUDGMENT

Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A.8441/2024

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.REV.P. 374/2024 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 459/2024

1. Criminal Revision Petition under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 15.02.2024 passed by the learned ASJ-05 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi in CA. No. 123/2023.Vide aforesaid judgment, the conviction vide judgment dated 06.03.2023 and order on sentence dated 12.04.2023 passed by the learned M.M have been upheld.

2. The factual position, as noticed in paragraph-2 of judgment dated 06.03.2023 passed by the learned Trial Court/MM may be reproduced for reference:

    "2. The present complaint alleges, inter alia, that complainant and accused were having good terms with each other. In the 1st week of November, 2020- accused approached the complainant for a friendly loan of Rs.2,00,000/- for the marriage of his son and represented that he would return the loan amount to the complainant before 20.04.2021. On this, complainant gave Rs.2,00,000/- to the accused on 09.11.2020 in cash and the accused assured to return Rs.2,00,000/- before 2004.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top