IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J.
Abdul Muqtadir - Appellant
Versus
The State & Anr. - Respondents
Cr.M.C. 1665 of 2024
Decided On : 19-03-2024
Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Amicable Settlement and Abuse of Process of Court
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash FIR registered under Sections 500/509 IPC and Sections 66E/67 of IT Act, alleging creation of a fictitious Instagram account in the name of the respondent and theft of photographs.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner and the respondent had amicably settled their dispute, and there was no threat, pressure, or coercion involved. The court considered the nature and gravity of the offence and the impact on society, and acknowledged the possibility of the petitioner's device being hacked or misused.
Issues: The issues revolved around the invocation of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the criminal proceedings, the amicable settlement between the parties, and the abuse of the process of the court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that when the offender and victim have settled their dispute, the power to quash criminal proceedings may be used based on the facts and circumstances of each case. It emphasized the need to consider the nature and gravity of the offence and the impact on society, and acknowledged the possibility of the petitioner's device being hacked or misused.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom, as the matter had been amicably settled between the parties and continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the process of the court.
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. (Oral)
1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C.') has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 0205/2020, under Sections 500/509 IPC, registered at P.S.: Amar Colony. Sections 66E/67 of IT Act were subsequently invoked.
2. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, present FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 wherein, she alleged that some unknown person created fictitious account on instagram in her name which came to her notice on 25.05.2020. Further, someone had stolen her photographs and published them by describing in the words `S... L...'. Present FIR was accordingly registered.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working in a semi government organization and the concerned electronic device appears to have been hacked or misused without his permission and he is unaware of creation of the aforesaid alleged account. It is further pointed out that the petitioner is aged about 24 years with clean past antecedents and continuation of present proceedings shall be a blot on his career.
4. Learned APP for the State submits that since electronic device with corresponding IP address was traced in the name of the petitioner, charge- sheet was accordingly filed. However, in view of amicable settlement between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.
5. Petitioner as well as respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by Insp. Rizwan Khan, P.S.: Amar Colony. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.
6. The disputes have been amicably resolved between petitioner and respondent No. 2 vide Settlement Deed dated 09.02.2024.
7. Petitioner in the present case seeks to invoke the powers under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure. The same is to be used to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of process of any Court. In which cases, the power to quash the criminal proceedings or the complaint or FIR may be used when the offender as well as victim have settled their dispute, would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case and no generalised list or categories can be prescribed. However, the Court is required to give due regard to the nature and gravity of the offence and consider the impact on the society.
8. Parties intend to put quietus to the proceedings and move forward in life. It cannot be ruled out that the device of petitioner may have been hacked or misused, as contended on behalf of petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. Continuation of proceedings would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 0205/2020, under Sections 500/509 IPC & Sections 66E/67 of IT Act registered at P.S.: Amar Colony and the proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.
Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement, considering the nature and gravity of the offence and the impact on society.
The power of quashing should be exercised sparingly, and the courts have a limited jurisdiction to consider whether there is sufficient material to proceed further against the accused.
The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings when the offender and victim have settled their dispute, considering the nature and gravity of the offence and the impact on society.
The court may quash proceedings under Section 66A of IT Act based on a settlement between the parties if the offence is predominantly private in nature.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, considering the nature and gravity of the offence and its impact on society.
Section 482 preserves inherent powers of High Court to prevent an abuse of process of any court or to secure the ends of justice. The provision does not confer new powers. It only recognises and pres....
The power under section 482 of Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly and only in cases where no cognizable offense is disclosed in the FIR.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.