Back
C. HARI SHANKAR
Shivansh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Glt Saraswati Bal Mandir Sr Sec School – Respondent
ORDER (Oral)
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Mr. Rajesh Gupta, learned Counsel for Respondent 1 school submits, on instructions, that both the petitioners have been given regular admission by Respondent 1 school as EWS candidates and would be imparted education as EWS candidates with all entitlements and facilities available to EWS students including uniform, textbooks etc.
2. Mr. Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioners confirms that this is the position. In that view of the matter, Mr. Tandon submits that the grievances of the petitioners stand redressed.
3. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
The court's decision was based on the respondent school's agreement to provide all entitlements available to EWS students for the next academic session in accordance with the RTE Act and Circulars is....
The court's decision was influenced by the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, and the agreement of the school to admit Petitioner 1 as an EWS student on humanitarian ground....
The court's decision was influenced by the acceptance of the petitioner's admission under the EWS/DG category by the respondent-school.
The innocence of the children involved in admission disputes should be considered, and the court may allow completion of the current academic year without further promotion.
The specific application, shortlisting, and allocation process by the Directorate of Education are essential for EWS student admissions, and without these, there is no enforceable right to seek admis....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
