SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1009

MINI PUSHKARNA
Rupesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Principal De Indian Public School – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. N.K. Upadhyay and Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, SC (Civil), GNCTD for DOE with Mr. Pradyumn Rao, Mr. Tapesh Raghav, Ms. Mahak Rankawat, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Ms. Mehek Rankawat and Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing]

Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)--Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the respondent-school has already accepted the admission of the petitioner under the EWS/DG category. The child in question is already studying in the school.

2. In view thereof, the present writ petition is disposed of as satisfied.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top