IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
Monu @ Jiji - Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(Cr) 2752 of 2023
Decided On : 08-04-2024
Furlough - Criminal Procedure - Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, Rules 1197, 1200, 1223
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ to quash the furlough rejection order and to direct the release on furlough for a period of three weeks in a case under Section 302 IPC. The petitioner had been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment, and had earned good conduct reports.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner fulfilled the criteria for furlough as per the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, and had a satisfactory jail conduct.
Issues: The issues revolved around the rejection of furlough and the petitioner's eligibility for furlough based on the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.
Ratio Decidendi: The court analyzed the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, particularly Rules 1197, 1200, and 1223, to determine the objectives and criteria for releasing a prisoner on furlough.
Final Decision: The court granted furlough to the petitioner for three weeks with specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. (Oral) - The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking following reliefs:
"...a. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Certiorari quashing the furlough rejection order no. No. F. 10(3741962)/CJ/LEGAL/PHQ/2023/52194 dated 21.08.2023;
b. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to release the petitioner on furlough for a period of three weeks in FIR no. 260/2016, PS: South Rohini, Delhi, Under Section: 302 IPC;
c. Allow the petitioner to furnish one surety of Rs.5,000/- to the satisfaction of Jail Superintendent, CJ-02, Tihar;
2. The petitioner is presently confined in Central Jail No. 2 Tihar, New Delhi. By virtue of judgment dated 13.02.2019, the petitioner was convicted under Sections 302 of IPC in case arising out of FIR bearing No. 260/2016, registered at Police Station South Rohini, Delhi and was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi. His appeal against conviction i.e., CRL.A. 909/2019 was dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 23.05.2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petitioner has earned last three annual good conduct reports and is fully entitled to avail the liberty of furlough as per Rule 1220, Delhi Prison Rules, 2018. It is stated that respondent failed to appreciate that the petitioner has already spent more than seven years in incarceration excluding remission till now and during the period of incarceration, the petitioner has diligently performed the work as and when assigned by the jail authorities. It has also been stated that the respondent has passed the order rejecting furlough to the petitioner in a very mechanical manner without application of mind. It is therefore prayed that the petitioner be released on furlough for a period of three weeks.
4. Learned ASC appearing on behalf of the state submits that furlough was rejected on the ground that the address of the petitioner could not be verified. However, the ASC for the State on instructions, submits that the property i.e., Jhuggi No. 105, Indira JJ Camp Sector-3, Rohini, Delhi has been verified and it belongs to the present petitioner.
5. This Court has heard arguments addressed on behalf of both parties and has perused the material placed on record.
6. This Court has also gone through the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, Rules 1197 and 1200 provide insight as to what objects are achieved by releasing a convict on parole. The said rules read as under:
"1197. Parole and Furlough to inmates are progressive measures of correctional services. The release of prisoner on parole not only saves him from the evils of incarceration but also enables him to maintain social relations with his family and community. It also helps him to maintain and develop a sense of self-confidence. Continued contacts with family and the community sustain in him a hope for life. The release of prisoner on furlough motivates him to maintain good conduct and remain disciplined in the prison.
****
1200. The objectives of releasing a prisoner on parole and furlough are:
i.) To enable the inmate to maintain continuity with his family life and deal with familial and social matters,
ii. To enable him to maintain and develop his self-confidence,
iii. To enable him to develop constructive hope and active interest in life,
iv. To help him remain in touch with the developments in the outside world,
v. To help him remain physiologically and psychologically healthy,
vi. To enable him to overcome/recover from the stress and evil effects of incarceration, and
vii. To motivate him to maintain good conduct and discipline in the prison..."
7. Further, Rule 1223 provides criteria in which a prisoner can be released on furlough. The said rule reads as under:
"1223. In order to be eligible to obtain furlough, the prisoner must fulfill the
The central legal point established is the application of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, in determining the eligibility and conditions for granting furlough to a prisoner.
The grant of furlough as a reward for good conduct and the court's discretion in modifying furlough conditions based on the petitioner's conduct and fulfillment of eligibility criteria.
The court balanced the interests of the convict and society, considered family exigencies, and issued guidelines for reasoned rejection orders.
The Court emphasized the objectives of furlough as per the Delhi Prison Rules and considered the petitioner's eligibility and conduct in jail in granting the relief.
The court emphasized that good conduct in prison is a valid basis for granting furlough, overriding past re-arrests during parole.
The court emphasized the reformative approach to rehabilitation and the need to balance the interests of the convict and society in granting furlough.
The judgment emphasizes the public interest in granting furlough, considering the reformation theory of sentencing and the potential threat to society posed by habitual offenders.
The main legal point established is the significance of personal liberty, reformation theory of sentencing, and the need to balance public interest with the individual's potential for reformation and....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.