Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sukhmani Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for either of the parties.
3. These petitions seek winding up of the Respondent Companies. The dispute relates to certain corporate guarantees dated 17th June, 2013 issued by the Respondents in lieu of credit facilities availed of by M/s. Tulip Telecom Ltd. The details of the petitions against whom winding up is sought are as under:
| Writ Petition | Respondent Company |
| CO.PET. 229/2016 | Sukhmani Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. |
| CO.PET. 231/2016 | Sharad Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. |
| CO.PET. 232/2016 | Firepro Wireless and Technologies Pvt. Ltd. |
| CO.PET. 233/2016 | Iron Traders Pvt. Ltd. |
| CO.PET. 235/2016 | Cedar Infonet Pvt. Ltd. |
4. Notice was issued in this petition initially in 2016 and an interim order was passed on 19th April 2016 to the following effect:
"Till the next date of hearing, the Respondent company shall not dispose off or alienate or encumber either directly or indirectly, or otherwise part with possession of any assets of the company to the tune of Rs. 680 crores, except in the ordinary course of business and for the payment of salaries and statutory dues."
Thereafter pleadings have been completed in the ma
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that in cases where the winding up process is not at an advanced stage, the matter is to be transferred to the NCLT in accordance with the Inso....
The discretion to transfer winding up proceedings to NCLT under Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act must prioritize potential corporate revival, and no irreversible actions should have occurred.
A winding-up petition can be transferred to the NCLT without a formal application if no irreversible steps have been taken in the liquidation process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, and Rule 5 of the MCA notification dated 7th December, 2016, in directing the transfer o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation to transfer winding-up proceedings to the NCLT in the absence of irreversible or exceptional circumstances, as per the amended Secti....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that winding up petitions at a nascent stage should be transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in accordance with Section 434 of th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
