Back
MINI PUSHKARNA
BP P. L. C. – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chandra, Trading As Shivay Enterprises – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
I.A. 8999/2024
1. The present application has been filed under Order XIII-A Rules 3 & 6(1)(a) read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (“CPC”).
2. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiffs seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant from dealing in engine oil, coolants and lubricants and/or similar goods, bearing the defendant's Marks and Packaging, BPL, BPL GOLD, 
and the Oil in Action Device Mark 
, and/or the piratical container(s) 
and marks or packaging or designs that are nearly identical/similar to the plaintiffs’ Marks and Packaging.
3. The plaintiffs seek a summary judgment against the defendant, on the ground that the defendant has no prospect of defending the plaintiffs’ claims and in view of the various admissions by the defendant with respect to his use of the defendant’s Marks and Packaging, which are nearly identical/deceptively similar to the plaintiffs’ Marks and Packaging and plaintiffs’ Container Design.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs submits that, the defendant has made various admissions, including, his written statement and his reply to Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, with respect to his use of th
The court affirmed that summary judgment can be granted when a defendant lacks a real prospect of successfully defending against claims of trademark infringement.
The court granted a summary judgment for trademark infringement due to the defendants' failure to contest the claims, establishing the plaintiff's rights in the 'MILLENNIUM' mark.
Trademark infringement, passing off, and copyright violation were established, leading to the grant of a permanent injunction, damages, and costs in favor of the plaintiff.
The court granted a permanent injunction against defendants for using a deceptively similar trademark, affirming the plaintiff's established rights over their well-known trademarks.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the protection of trademarks, the likelihood of confusion or deception arising from the similarity of marks, and the prima facie case of infringeme....
Trademark infringement and protection of well-known marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff for trademark infringement, recognizing 'Officer’s Choice' as a well-known mark and emphasizing the irreparable harm from the defend....
Summary judgment can be granted in commercial disputes when the defendant lacks real prospects of successfully defending the claim.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
