SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 903

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
Shadab Khan – Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau – Respondent
Bail Appln. 2223 of 2024
Decided on : 13-11-2024

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Mr. Kushal Kumar, Mr. Anmol Sachdeva, Ms. Megha Saroa and Mr. Janak Raj Ambavat, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Subhash Bansal, Senior Standing Counsel for NCB with Mr. Shashwat Bansal, Advocate (Through VC)

IMPORTANT POINT
The court upheld the presumption of conscious possession under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the burden on the accused to prove otherwise, and denied bail due to the commercial quantity of narcotics involved.

Headnote:

(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22(c), 23(c), 29, 35, 37, and 52A - Bail application - Applicant sought bail in a case involving commercial quantity of narcotics - The court found that the applicant was in conscious possession of the narcotics and failed to prove otherwise - The statutory presumption under Section 35 of the NDPS Act was against the applicant, who did not meet the threshold for bail under Section 37. (Paras 40, 44, 46, 52)

(B) Conscious Possession - The court reiterated that conscious possession is a question of fact determined by the circumstances of each case, emphasizing the burden on the accused to prove lack of conscious possession. (Paras 30, 34)

Facts of the case:

The applicant was implicated in a narcotics case involving the recovery of 2.083 kg of Tramadol tablets, with the prosecution asserting that he was involved in the trafficking of the narcotics.

Findings of Court:

The court found no merit in the applicant's claims of lack of conscious possession and upheld the statutory presumption against him.

Issues: The main issues were whether the applicant was in conscious possession of the narcotics and whether procedural lapses in the investigation warranted bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's involvement in the trafficking was established, and the presumption of conscious possession under the NDPS Act was applicable.

Result: Bail application dismissed.

ORDER :

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “CrPC”) (now Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) seeking regular bail in complaint case no. VIII/42/DZU/21 registered under Sections 22(c)/23(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985 (hereinafter “NDPS”) at Police Station –Narcotics Control Bureau (hereinafter “NCB”).

2. As per the prosecution, on 26th July, 2021, secret information was received by Sh. JP Singh, Investigating Officer, NCB-DZU that a parcel bearing no. 8007134192 containing narcotics and psychotropic substance destined to United States is lying at DHL Express Pvt. Ltd.

3. Thereafter, the information was reduced into typing and was put before Assistant Director, NCB-DZU who marked the same with the direction to take necessary actions as per the law under the NDPS Act. The raiding team was constituted and they, along with the field-testing kit and all the requisite items required for search and seizure proceedings, reached DHL Express Pvt. Ltd., 71/3 Rama Road, Near Kirti Nagar, New Delhi at about 16.05 Hrs.

4. It is stated that the raiding team met one of the employees of the aforesaid courier company and after disclosing their identity, one Mr. Mustafa Raza agreed to become an independent witness. Thereafter, the suspected parcel with way Bill bearing No. 8007134192 was brought before the NCB team and the parcel was examined. The parcel was in the form of Khaki Cardboard box on which the details in the form of an invoice and way Bill were pasted.

5. Thereafter, the parcel was opened and upon opening the said carton box, six cylindrical shaped rolls of golden coloured laces were recovered. Upon removing the golden-coloured lace, a cotton thread was seen, on further removing it, strips of Tramadol Tablets were found concealed in it under which the plastic frame of roll was found. Similarly on checking the remaining rolls, same sort of packing was found in which Tramadol Tablets were concealed in similar fashion. The details of the quality and quantity are – Total 595 x 10 = 5950; Name of tablet – NRx Tramadol Hydocholride Tablets “OL – TRAM” (00 mg) manufactured by HAB Pharmaceuticals and Research Limited.

6. The weight of the 10 tablets was taken, it was found to be 3.5 Grams. By assumption and calculation there were 595 strips in total and there will be a total of 5950 tablets. Total weight of 5950 tablets came out to be 2.083 Kgs. The raiding team de-stripped the tablets and the emptied the same in a small pouch along with the remaining 594 strips were then put into a transparent polythene packet and its mouth was tied with the help of a plastic sutli. The seizure report dated 27th July, 2021 was prepared and thereafter, the seizure was sent to Malkhana.

7. The proceeding under Section 52A of the NDPS was compiled by the Investigating Officer (hereinafter “IO”) for drawing of samples from the seized case property on 18th August, 2021 before the learned Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate for sampling of the recovered contraband having 595 strips bearing batch no 964-09, that is, 5950 tablets in total. Two samples, marked as Mark A & A2, of one strip of 10 tablets each were drawn by the IO. During the investigation, the prosecution issued a notice under Section 67 of the NDPS to Mr. Rajesh Gupta on 25th August, 2021 and his statement was recorded on dated 1st September, 2021.

8. On 2nd September, 2022, Mr. Rishabh Tandon (co-accused) was intercepted at Lucknow and his statement under Section 67 of the NDPS was recorded. It is stated that Mr. Tandon tendered his statement voluntary wherein he disclosed that he received the aforesaid parcel from Mr. Shadab Khan (co-accused/applicant herein) and booked the same. He also disclosed other incriminating facts and allegedly admitted his involvement with the applicant herein in the commission of present crim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top