IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
Shadab Khan – Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau – Respondent
Bail Appln. 2223 of 2024
Decided on : 13-11-2024
(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22(c), 23(c), 29, 35, 37, and 52A - Bail application - Applicant sought bail in a case involving commercial quantity of narcotics - The court found that the applicant was in conscious possession of the narcotics and failed to prove otherwise - The statutory presumption under Section 35 of the NDPS Act was against the applicant, who did not meet the threshold for bail under Section 37. (Paras 40, 44, 46, 52)
(B) Conscious Possession - The court reiterated that conscious possession is a question of fact determined by the circumstances of each case, emphasizing the burden on the accused to prove lack of conscious possession. (Paras 30, 34)
Facts of the case:
The applicant was implicated in a narcotics case involving the recovery of 2.083 kg of Tramadol tablets, with the prosecution asserting that he was involved in the trafficking of the narcotics.
Findings of Court:
The court found no merit in the applicant's claims of lack of conscious possession and upheld the statutory presumption against him.
Issues: The main issues were whether the applicant was in conscious possession of the narcotics and whether procedural lapses in the investigation warranted bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's involvement in the trafficking was established, and the presumption of conscious possession under the NDPS Act was applicable.
Result: Bail application dismissed.
ORDER :
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “CrPC”) (now Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) seeking regular bail in complaint case no. VIII/42/DZU/21 registered under Sections 22(c)/23(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985 (hereinafter “NDPS”) at Police Station –Narcotics Control Bureau (hereinafter “NCB”).
2. As per the prosecution, on 26th July, 2021, secret information was received by Sh. JP Singh, Investigating Officer, NCB-DZU that a parcel bearing no. 8007134192 containing narcotics and psychotropic substance destined to United States is lying at DHL Express Pvt. Ltd.
3. Thereafter, the information was reduced into typing and was put before Assistant Director, NCB-DZU who marked the same with the direction to take necessary actions as per the law under the NDPS Act. The raiding team was constituted and they, along with the field-testing kit and all the requisite items required for search and seizure proceedings, reached DHL Express Pvt. Ltd., 71/3 Rama Road, Near Kirti Nagar, New Delhi at about 16.05 Hrs.
4. It is stated that the raiding team met one of the employees of the aforesaid courier company and after disclosing their identity, one Mr. Mustafa Raza agreed to become an independent witness. Thereafter, the suspected parcel with way Bill bearing No. 8007134192 was brought before the NCB team and the parcel was examined. The parcel was in the form of Khaki Cardboard box on which the details in the form of an invoice and way Bill were pasted.
5. Thereafter, the parcel was opened and upon opening the said carton box, six cylindrical shaped rolls of golden coloured laces were recovered. Upon removing the golden-coloured lace, a cotton thread was seen, on further removing it, strips of Tramadol Tablets were found concealed in it under which the plastic frame of roll was found. Similarly on checking the remaining rolls, same sort of packing was found in which Tramadol Tablets were concealed in similar fashion. The details of the quality and quantity are – Total 595 x 10 = 5950; Name of tablet – NRx Tramadol Hydocholride Tablets “OL – TRAM” (00 mg) manufactured by HAB Pharmaceuticals and Research Limited.
6. The weight of the 10 tablets was taken, it was found to be 3.5 Grams. By assumption and calculation there were 595 strips in total and there will be a total of 5950 tablets. Total weight of 5950 tablets came out to be 2.083 Kgs. The raiding team de-stripped the tablets and the emptied the same in a small pouch along with the remaining 594 strips were then put into a transparent polythene packet and its mouth was tied with the help of a plastic sutli. The seizure report dated 27th July, 2021 was prepared and thereafter, the seizure was sent to Malkhana.
7. The proceeding under Section 52A of the NDPS was compiled by the Investigating Officer (hereinafter “IO”) for drawing of samples from the seized case property on 18th August, 2021 before the learned Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate for sampling of the recovered contraband having 595 strips bearing batch no 964-09, that is, 5950 tablets in total. Two samples, marked as Mark A & A2, of one strip of 10 tablets each were drawn by the IO. During the investigation, the prosecution issued a notice under Section 67 of the NDPS to Mr. Rajesh Gupta on 25th August, 2021 and his statement was recorded on dated 1st September, 2021.
8. On 2nd September, 2022, Mr. Rishabh Tandon (co-accused) was intercepted at Lucknow and his statement under Section 67 of the NDPS was recorded. It is stated that Mr. Tandon tendered his statement voluntary wherein he disclosed that he received the aforesaid parcel from Mr. Shadab Khan (co-accused/applicant herein) and booked the same. He also disclosed other incriminating facts and allegedly admitted his involvement with the applicant herein in the commission of present crim
The court upheld the presumption of conscious possession under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the burden on the accused to prove otherwise, and denied bail due to the commercial quantity of narcotics invo....
The court ruled that mere procedural lapses do not justify bail in cases involving commercial quantities of narcotics, emphasizing the presumption of conscious possession under the NDPS Act.
Lack of direct evidence of conscious possession under NDPS Act warrants bail when the prosecution fails to establish knowledge or control over contraband.
The court emphasized that under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, bail cannot be granted unless there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences.
The judgment established that the gravity of the offence, the impact of the illicit drug trade, and the concept of conscious possession are crucial factors in determining bail eligibility under the N....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of liberty and the need to avoid pre-conviction incarceration, balancing the recovery of contraband with the potential innocence of the accused and the impact o....
(1) Standard prescribed for grant of bail is ‘reasonable ground to believe’ that person is not guilty of offence.(2) Given seriousness of offences punishable under NDPS Act and in order to curb menac....
Bail – While duration of detention is a relevant factor, it cannot override bar of Section 37 NDPS Act – Court must balance personal liberty against need to prevent further risk to public safety and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that possession of commercial quantity contraband invokes the rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, precluding bail. The judgment also emphasizes t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict application of Section 37 of the NDPS Act in restricting bail for offences involving commercial quantity of narcotics. The court emphasi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.