DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, HIMA KOHLI
Vinitec Electronics Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
HCL Infosystems Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J.
1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 3rd November, 2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No.273/2004, rejecting the petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking an interim injunction pending arbitration against encashment/remittance of the performance bank guarantee at 10% of the contract value furnished to the respondent or any one acting on its behalf.
2. An agreement was entered into between the appellant and the respondent on 10th May, 2000, whereunder the respondent agreed to buy UPS Systems from the appellant for a consideration value of Rs.1,68,12,400/-. Payment term in clause 15 (a) to (d) thereof provided for phased payments linked with supply of equipment with performance bank guarantee of 10% to be provided at 15(b) stage. At the stage when the appellant demanded payment of the balance amount, the respondent agreed to pay the same provided appellant furnished performance bank guarantee so agreed to by the appellant and in terms of the aforesaid agreement the appellant furnished a conditional bank guarantee for Rs.16,81,238.50p. The aforesaid conditional ban
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.