SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, HIMA KOHLI
Vinitec Electronics Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
HCL Infosystems Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J.

1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 3rd November, 2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No.273/2004, rejecting the petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking an interim injunction pending arbitration against encashment/remittance of the performance bank guarantee at 10% of the contract value furnished to the respondent or any one acting on its behalf.

2. An agreement was entered into between the appellant and the respondent on 10th May, 2000, whereunder the respondent agreed to buy UPS Systems from the appellant for a consideration value of Rs.1,68,12,400/-. Payment term in clause 15 (a) to (d) thereof provided for phased payments linked with supply of equipment with performance bank guarantee of 10% to be provided at 15(b) stage. At the stage when the appellant demanded payment of the balance amount, the respondent agreed to pay the same provided appellant furnished performance bank guarantee so agreed to by the appellant and in terms of the aforesaid agreement the appellant furnished a conditional bank guarantee for Rs.16,81,238.50p. The aforesaid conditional ban

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top