MUKUL MUDGAL, J.

1. This FAO challenges the order dated 31st March, 2006 passed by the learned Single Judge giving directions with respect to the conducting of elections of the Respondent Union which have led to the present appeal.

2. The facts of the case have been summarized briefly as under:-

(a) On 11th April 1998 at the 30th Annual General Meeting of the Respondent Union the Appellant was re-elected General Secretary. On 13th-15th November 1998, a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Respondent Union was held at Puri (Orissa) and was attended by the Appellant. At this meeting an alleged resolution was passed entrusting and empowering the President to keep a watch on the activities of the Appellant and to remove him if his activities were found to be anti-social. The said resolution was denied by the Appellant as being a fabricated document.

(b) On 16th March, 1999 the President of the Union removed the Appellant from the post of General Secretary. Admittedly, no show-cause notice was issued to the Appellant before taking the said decision.

(c) The decision of the President was sought to be ratified at a meeting of the Union held on 24th March 1999, no notice