SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
S.MURALIDHAR
Tuncay Alankus – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Muralidhar, J.

1. The challenge in this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) is to an order dated 19th January 2004 passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI, Delhi in CBI Case No. 3(A) of ACU (1)/New Delhi titled "CBI v. C.K. Ramakrishnan & Others".

2. The petitioner who is a Turkish national is facing trial for the offences under Sections 120-B read with 409 IPC and alternatively Sections 120-B read with 420 IPC. By the impugned order the learned Special Judge rejected the petitioner's plea for replacing the interpreter provided to him in the aforementioned case with a more competent one and for a direction to restart the trial thereafter in compliance with Sections 228, 278, 279 and 282 CrPC.

3. The facts leading to the filing of the present petition are that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a charge sheet on 26th December 1997 alleging that 9 accused persons, including the Petitioner, had entered into a criminal conspiracy to defraud National Fertilizers Limited (NFL) and misappropriate its funds to the tune of US$ 3,80,00,000 (equivalent to Rs. 133 crores at the then rate of exchange). According to the CBI, N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top