JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral)

1. All the three appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment inasmuch as the issue in all the three appeals is same viz. whether the appellant in RFA No.180/04 Sh. Pawan Kumar Dalmia was or was not terminated from the services of the defendant No.1/respondent No.1-company-M/s. HCL Infosystems Ltd., and if there is termination of services, whether the services were validly terminated. The claim in the suit, which has been dismissed by the impugned judgment which is under challenge in RFA No.180/2004 was towards salary from June, 1999 till filing of the suit on 31.5.2002 on the ground that Sh. Pawan Kumar Dalmia was not validly terminated from services and therefore liability of defendant No.1/respondent No.1 towards payment of salary continues. The suit which has been dismissed by the impugned judgment which is the subject matter of RFA No.235/2004 was a suit filed by Mrs. Manju Dalmia, wife of Sh. Pawan Kumar Dalmia, making Sh. Pawan Kumar Dalmia as plaintiff No.2 claiming that the premises belonging to the wife-Mrs. Manju Dalmia were taken on self-lease, and since the services of Sh. Pawan Kumar Dalmia are not terminated or not lega