SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
G.P.MITTAL
Meena – Appellant
Versus
Sube Singh – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

G. P. Mittal, J.

1. These are two Cross Appeals. MAC APP. 812/2010 has been preferred by the Claimants who are the legal representatives of the deceased Balbir Singh for enhancement of compensation of Rs. 16,42,000/- awarded for his death in an accident which took place on 03.11.2008. In Cross Appeal MAC APP. 30/2011 Appellant Reliance General Insurance Company Limited disputes the Insurance Company's liability to pay the compensation as Respondent No.5 (Sube Singh, the driver) did not possess a valid and effective driving licence to drive the offending vehicle on the date of the accident and there was no permit to drive the tempo number HR-5C-8498. The Insurance Company avers that the quantum of compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- towards the loss of love and affection was exorbitant and excessive and prays for deduction of the compensation.

2. For the sake of convenience Meena and Others in MAC APP. 812/2010 shall be referred to as the Claimants and the Appellant Reliance General Insurance Company Limited in MAC APP. 30/2011, who is the insurer of the offending vehicle HR-55C-8498 shall be referred to as the Insurer and Respondents No.5 and 6, who are the driver and the o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top