SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJIV KHANNA, S.P.GARG
Rakesh Kumar Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjiv Khanna, J.:

Rakesh Kumar Jha, the appellant herein, impugns his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for having committed murder of Suman Rai. He has been sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he has to undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months.

2. One Suman Rai was found dead in House No. E-50, Ist Floor, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi on 14th May, 2006.She had died a homicidal death, as her body, found in a pool of blood, had injury marks. The post mortem report (Ex. P-17/A) establishes that it was an unnatural death.These facts remain undisputed.

3. The core question is whether the appellant is responsible and has committed the said offence?

4. The prosecution's case is that on 14th May, 2006, at about 1.00 P.M., the appellant went to Police Station, Lajpat Nagar and confessed that he had murdered Suman Rai in House No. E-50, Ist Floor, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi (vide DD Entry No. 11A). The prosecution, in addition, relies upon one Srinivas Kumar (PW-20), who was working for the deceased. As per the charge sheet, Srinivas Kumar had stated that the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top