SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
R.K.GAUBA
Naveen Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


ORDER(Oral)

1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 07.09.2005. From out of the said wedlock, a male child named Deepanshu took birth on 14.10.2008. The marriage ran into rough weather. The second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.350/2013 having been registered on 21.10.2013 by police station Lajpat Nagar on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his brother (second petitioner) and his mother (third petitioner). On conclusion of the investigation, police filed report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) on which cognizance was taken.

2. It appears that the parties also came to be involved in certain other cases including a petition under section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and a case for divorce filed by the first petitioner. The parties, however, were persuaded to enter into an amicable settlement, they having executed a settlement

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top