Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Kirti Vashisht – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. repeated complaints without substantial evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. allegations of harassment and extortion. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. inquiry process and witness statements. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. clarification of inquiry procedures. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. mandatory registration of fir under section 154. (Para 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. direction for police action on complaints. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 7. communication obligations regarding complaint status. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondent no 2 to 4 to close the enquiry initiated vide notices dated 23.08.2019 and 26.08.2019 on complaint dated 26.07.2019 made by respondent no.7 pending before respondent no.3 and 4 i.e. P.S. Kapashera, New Delhi.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent no.7/Babita Sharma filed a complaint dated 10.04.2017 bearing D.D No. 65B (hereinafter referred to as 'The First Complaint') against the petitioner alleging forgery before the respondent no.5/S.H.O. P.S. Najafgarh in regard to one plot bearing no. A-108/1, Ragbir Enclave, Virendra Ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
