Rajesh Kumar Sharma vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Rajesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent

Table of Content
1. nature of insurance fraud and convictions (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. challenges to prosecution evidence and representation (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. court's reasoning on evidence and conspiracy (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. concurrence of sentences in related cases (Para 22 , 23)
5. final order and dismissal of appeal (Para 24)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 29.11.2016 in A.C. No. 54/2016, whereby the appellant and his brother (Ravinder Sharma) were convicted for the offences punishable under Section 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (IPC) read with Sections 420 /476/468/471 of the IPC and Sections 13 (2) and 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereafter the `PC Act'). The appellant was sentenced to undergo three years of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.4,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of six months. The appellant's brother Ravinder Kumar (since deceased) was also sentenced for committing offences punishable under Sections 120B/420/467/468/471 of the IPC and Sections 13 (2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTVIBHU BAKHRURajesh Kumar Sharma – AppellantVersusCentral Bureau of Investigation – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Rajesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent