SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Dhiraj Puri – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. allegations and circumstances of involvement in robbery (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding lack of direct evidence (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. status of the petitioner's family (Para 11)
4. grant of bail with conditions (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.293/2018 Police Station Patel Nagar under Sections 394 /398/511/34 IPC.

3. FIR was registered on the statement given by the driver of a private cash van, who contended that at about 11.30-11.45 am he had taken the cash van from the office at Naraina Vihar along with other employees for loading cash in the ATMs. Near Patel Nagar at about 1.15 PM the custodian, auditor and the gunman took the cash to load in an ATM. While he was sitting in the vehicle with the gunman and the windows of the vehicle were open and a cash box was also in the vehicle, two boys came from the front side of the vehicle holding something which resembled a weapon but their faces were muffled with a handkerchief and one of the boys pointed a weapon like object on him and the other pointed a weapon on the gunman. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top