Ramey Krishan Rana vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, PRATEEK JALAN
Ramey Krishan Rana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. overview of the anti-suit injunction application (Para 1 , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16)
2. facts of patent enforcement rights and frand terms (Para 2 , 6 , 32 , 34)
3. plaintiff's arguments against the anti-suit injunction (Para 14 , 19 , 27 , 28)
4. judicial perspective on the principles governing anti-suit injunctions (Para 20 , 39 , 63)
5. comity of courts and judicial fairness (Para 36 , 46 , 61)
6. decision on the ad interim relief (Para 79 , 80)

ORDER

I.A. 8772/2020 in CS(COMM) 295/2020

1. In a standard essential patent (SEP) royalty rate-setting suit, preferred against the plaintiff before the Wuhan Intermediate People's Court (hereinafter referred to as "the Wuhan Court"), the defendant moved an application, on 4th August, 2020, seeking an anti-suit injunction, restraining the plaintiffs from prosecuting the present suit before this Court. In the said application, the Wuhan Court has, vide order dated 23rd September, 2020, issued the following directions:

"1. Upon service of this ruling, the Respondents InterDigital, Inc. and InterDigital Holdings, Inc. as well as the affiliates thereof shall immediately withdraw or suspend their application for any temporary injunction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTD.N.PATEL, PRATEEK JALANRamey Krishan Rana – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, PRATEEK JALAN
Ramey Krishan Rana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent